Researcher profile

Sergei Kucherenko

Sergei Kucherenko contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Active subspace methods and derivative-based Shapley effects for functions with non-independent variables

Lower-dimensional subspaces that impact estimates of uncertainty are often described by Linear combinations of input variables, leading to active variables. This paper extends the derivative-based active subspace methods and derivative-based Shapley effects to cope with functions with non-independent variables, and it introduces sensitivity-based active subspaces. While derivative-based subspace methods focus on directions along which the function exhibits significant variation, sensitivity-based subspace methods seek a reduced set of active variables that enables a reduction in the function's variance. We propose both theoretical results using the recent development of gradients of functions with non-independent variables and practical settings by making use of optimal computations of gradients, which admit dimension-free upper-bounds of the biases and the parametric rate of convergence. Simulations show that the relative performance of derivative-based and sensitivity-based active subspaces methods varies across different functions.

preprint2016arXiv

Different numerical estimators for main effect global sensitivity indices

The variance-based method of global sensitivity indices based on Sobol sensitivity indices became very popular among practitioners due to its easiness of interpretation. For complex practical problems computation of Sobol indices generally requires a large number of function evaluations to achieve reasonable convergence. Four different direct formulas for computing Sobol main effect sensitivity indices are compared on a set of test problems for which there are analytical results. These formulas are based on high-dimensional integrals which are evaluated using MC and QMC techniques. Direct formulas are also compared with a different approach based on the so-called double loop reordering formula. It is found that the double loop reordering (DLR) approach shows a superior performance among all methods both for models with independent and dependent variables.

preprint2016arXiv

Quantile based global sensitivity measures

New global sensitivity measures based on quantiles of the output are introduced. Such measures can be used for global sensitivity analysis of problems in which quantiles are explicitly the functions of interest and for identification of variables which are the most important in achieving extreme values of the model output. It is proven that there is a link between introduced measures and Sobol main effect sensitivity indices. Two different Monte Carlo estimators are considered. It is shown that the double loop reordering approach is much more efficient than the brute force estimator. Several test cases and practical case studies related to structural safety are used to illustrate the developed method. Results of numerical calculations show the efficiency of the presented technique.

preprint2015arXiv

Exploring multi-dimensional spaces: a Comparison of Latin Hypercube and Quasi Monte Carlo Sampling Techniques

Three sampling methods are compared for efficiency on a number of test problems of various complexity for which analytic quadratures are available. The methods compared are Monte Carlo with pseudo-random numbers, Latin Hypercube Sampling, and Quasi Monte Carlo with sampling based on Sobol sequences. Generally results show superior performance of the Quasi Monte Carlo approach based on Sobol sequences in line with theoretical predictions. Latin Hypercube Sampling can be more efficient than both Monte Carlo method and Quasi Monte Carlo method but the latter inequality holds for a reduced set of function typology and at small number of sampled points. In conclusion Quasi Monte Carlo method would appear the safest bet when integrating functions of unknown typology.