Source author record

Senshan Pan

Senshan Pan appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

The Termination of Algorithms for Computing Gröbner Bases

The F5 algorithm is generally believed as one of the fastest algorithms for computing Gröbner bases. However, its termination problem is still unclear. Recently, an algorithm GVW and its variant GVWHS have been proposed, and their efficiency are comparable to the F5 algorithm. In the paper, we clarify the concept of an admissible module order. For the first time, the connection between the reducible and rewritable check is discussed here. We show that the top-reduced S-Gröbner basis must be finite if the admissible monomial order and the admissible module order are compatible. This paper presents a complete proof of the termination and correctness of the GVWHS algorithm. What is more, it can be seen that the GVWHS is in fact an F5-like algorithm. Different from the GVWHS algorithm, the F5B algorithm may generate redundant sig-polynomials. Taking into account this situation, we prove the termination and correctness of the F5B algorithm. And we notice that the original F5 algorithm slightly differs from the F5B algorithm in the insertion strategy on which the F5-rewritten criterion is based. Exploring the potential ordering of sig-polynomials computed by the original F5 algorithm, we propose an F5GEN algorithm with a generalized insertion strategy, and prove the termination and correctness of it. Therefore, we have a positive answer to the long standing problem of proving the termination of the original F5 algorithm.