BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sen Zheng

Sen Zheng contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceDatabases

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Deciding the Loosely Guarded Fragment and Querying Its Horn Fragment Using Resolution

We consider the following query answering problem: Given a Boolean conjunctive query and a theory in the Horn loosely guarded fragment, the aim is to determine whether the query is entailed by the theory. In this paper, we present a resolution decision procedure for the loosely guarded fragment, and use such a procedure to answer Boolean conjunctive queries against the Horn loosely guarded fragment. The Horn loosely guarded fragment subsumes classes of rules that are prevalent in ontology-based query answering, such as Horn ALCHOI and guarded existential rules. Additionally, we identify star queries and cloud queries, which using our procedure, can be answered against the loosely guarded fragment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Querying Guarded Fragments via Resolution

Answering Boolean conjunctive queries over the guarded fragment is decidable, however, as yet no practical decision procedure exists. Meanwhile, ordered resolution, as a practically oriented algorithm, is widely used in state-of-art modern theorem provers. In this paper, we devise a resolution decision procedure, which not only proves decidability of querying of the guarded fragment, but is implementable in any `off-the-shelf' resolution theorem prover with modest effort. Further, we extend the procedure to querying the loosely guarded fragment. The difficulty in querying a knowledge base of (loosely) guarded clauses is that query clauses are not guarded. We show however there are ways to reformulate query clauses into (loosely) guarded clauses either directly via the separation and splitting rules, or via performing inferences using our top-variable inference system combining with a form of dynamic renaming. Therefore, the problem of querying the (loosely) guarded fragment can be reduced to deciding the (loosely) guarded fragment and possibly irreducible query clauses, i.e., a clause that cannot derive any new conclusion. Meanwhile, our procedure yields a goal-oriented query rewriting algorithm: Before introducing datasets, one can produce a saturated clausal set $\mathcal{S}$ using given BCQs and (loosely) guarded theories. Clauses in $\mathcal{S}$ can be easily transformed first-order queries, therefore query answering over the (loosely) guarded fragment is reduced to evaluating a union of first-order queries over datasets. As far as we know, this is the first practical decision procedure for answering and rewriting Boolean conjunctive queries over the guarded fragment and the loosely guarded fragment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access