BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sebastian Rudolph

Sebastian Rudolph contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Artificial IntelligenceLogic in Computer ScienceComputational ComplexityDatabasesmath.LO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

How to Agree to Disagree: Managing Ontological Perspectives using Standpoint Logic

The importance of taking individual, potentially conflicting perspectives into account when dealing with knowledge has been widely recognised. Many existing ontology management approaches fully merge knowledge perspectives, which may require weakening in order to maintain consistency; others represent the distinct views in an entirely detached way. As an alternative, we propose Standpoint Logic, a simple, yet versatile multi-modal logic "add-on" for existing KR languages intended for the integrated representation of domain knowledge relative to diverse, possibly conflicting standpoints, which can be hierarchically organised, combined and put in relation to each other. Starting from the generic framework of First-Order Standpoint Logic (FOSL), we subsequently focus our attention on the fragment of sentential formulas, for which we provide a polytime translation into the standpoint-free version. This result yields decidability and favourable complexities for a variety of highly expressive decidable fragments of first-order logic. Using some elaborate encoding tricks, we then establish a similar translation for the very expressive description logic SROIQb_s underlying the OWL 2 DL ontology language. By virtue of this result, existing highly optimised OWL reasoners can be used to provide practical reasoning support for ontology languages extended by standpoint modelling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Finite Model Theory of the Triguarded Fragment and Related Logics

The Triguarded Fragment (TGF) is among the most expressive decidable fragments of first-order logic, subsuming both its two-variable and guarded fragments without equality. We show that the TGF has the finite model property (providing a tight doubly exponential bound on the model size) and hence finite satisfiability coincides with satisfiability known to be N2ExpTime-complete. Using similar constructions, we also establish 2ExpTime-completeness for finite satisfiability of the constant-free (tri)guarded fragment with transitive guards.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Satisfiability and Query Answering in Description Logics with Global and Local Cardinality Constraints

We introduce and investigate the expressive description logic (DL) ALCSCC++, in which the global and local cardinality constraints introduced in previous papers can be mixed. On the one hand, we prove that this does not increase the complexity of satisfiability checking and other standard inference problems. On the other hand, the satisfiability problem becomes undecidable if inverse roles are added to the languages. In addition, even without inverse roles, conjunctive query entailment in this DL turns out to be undecidable. We prove that decidability of querying can be regained if global and local constraints are not mixed and the global constraints are appropriately restricted. The latter result is based on a locally-acyclic model construction, and it reduces query entailment to ABox consistency in the restricted setting, i.e., to ABox consistency w.r.t. restricted cardinality constraints in ALCSCC, for which we can show an ExpTime upper bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Nominals, Inverses, Counting, and Conjunctive Queries or: Why Infinity is your Friend!

Description Logics are knowledge representation formalisms that provide, for example, the logical underpinning of the W3C OWL standards. Conjunctive queries, the standard query language in databases, have recently gained significant attention as an expressive formalism for querying Description Logic knowledge bases. Several different techniques for deciding conjunctive query entailment are available for a wide range of DLs. Nevertheless, the combination of nominals, inverse roles, and number restrictions in OWL 1 and OWL 2 DL causes unsolvable problems for the techniques hitherto available. We tackle this problem and present a decidability result for entailment of unions of conjunctive queries in the DL ALCHOIQb that contains all three problematic constructors simultaneously. Provided that queries contain only simple roles, our result also shows decidability of entailment of (unions of) conjunctive queries in the logic that underpins OWL 1 DL and we believe that the presented results will pave the way for further progress towards conjunctive query entailment decision procedures for the Description Logics underlying the OWL standards.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Query Containment for Highly Expressive Datalog Fragments

The containment problem of Datalog queries is well known to be undecidable. There are, however, several Datalog fragments for which containment is known to be decidable, most notably monadic Datalog and several "regular" query languages on graphs. Monadically Defined Queries (MQs) have been introduced recently as a joint generalization of these query languages. In this paper, we study a wide range of Datalog fragments with decidable query containment and determine exact complexity results for this problem. We generalize MQs to (Frontier-)Guarded Queries (GQs), and show that the containment problem is 3ExpTime-complete in either case, even if we allow arbitrary Datalog in the sub-query. If we focus on graph query languages, i.e., fragments of linear Datalog, then this complexity is reduced to 2ExpSpace. We also consider nested queries, which gain further expressivity by using predicates that are defined by inner queries. We show that nesting leads to an exponentially increasing hierarchy for the complexity of query containment, both in the linear and in the general case. Our results settle open problems for (nested) MQs, and they paint a comprehensive picture of the state of the art in Datalog query containment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Modeling in OWL 2 without Restrictions

The Semantic Web ontology language OWL 2 DL comes with a variety of language features that enable sophisticated and practically useful modeling. However, the use of these features has been severely restricted in order to retain decidability of the language. For example, OWL 2 DL does not allow a property to be both transitive and asymmetric, which would be desirable, e.g., for representing an ancestor relation. In this paper, we argue that the so-called global restrictions of OWL 2 DL preclude many useful forms of modeling, by providing a catalog of basic modeling patterns that would be available in OWL 2 DL if the global restrictions were discarded. We then report on the results of evaluating several state-of-the-art OWL 2 DL reasoners on problems that use combinations of features in a way that the global restrictions are violated. The systems turn out to rely heavily on the global restrictions and are thus largely incapable of coping with the modeling patterns. Next we show how off-the-shelf first-order logic theorem proving technology can be used to perform reasoning in the OWL 2 direct semantics, the semantics that underlies OWL 2 DL, but without requiring the global restrictions. Applying a naive proof-of-concept implementation of this approach to the test problems was successful in all cases. Based on our observations, we make suggestions for future lines of research on expressive description logic-style OWL reasoning.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access