Researcher profile

Sebastian Lämmel

Sebastian Lämmel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Critical point theory for sparse recovery

We study the problem of sparse recovery in the context of compressed sensing. This is to minimize the sensing error of linear measurements by sparse vectors with at most $s$ non-zero entries. We develop the so-called critical point theory for sparse recovery. This is done by introducing nondegenerate M-stationary points which adequately describe the global structure of this nonconvex optimization problem. We show that all M-stationary points are generically nondegenerate. In particular, the sparsity constraint is active at all local minimizers of a generic sparse recovery problem. Additionally, the equivalence of strong stability and nondegeneracy for M-stationary points is shown. We claim that the appearance of saddle points - these are M-stationary points with exactly $s-1$ non-zero entries - cannot be neglected. For this purpose we derive a so-called Morse relation, which gives a lower bound on the number of saddle points in terms of the number of local minimizers. The relatively involved structure of saddle points can be seen as a source of well-known difficulty by solving the problem of sparse recovery to global optimality.

preprint2020arXiv

On nondegenerate M-stationary points for sparsity constrained nonlinear optimization

We study sparsity constrained nonlinear optimization (SCNO) from a topological point of view. Special focus will be on M-stationary points from Burdakov et al. (2016). We introduce nondegenerate M-stationary points and define their M-index. We show that all M-stationary points are generically nondegenerate. In particular, the sparsity constraint is active at all local minimizers of a generic SCNO. Some relations to other stationarity concepts, such as S-stationarity, basic feasibility, and CW-minimality, are discussed in detail. By doing so, the issues of instability and degeneracy of points due to different stationarity concepts are highlighted. The concept of M-stationarity allows to adequately describe the global structure of SCNO along the lines of Morse theory. For that, we study topological changes of lower level sets while passing an M-stationary point. As novelty for SCNO, multiple cells of dimension equal to the M-index are needed to be attached. This intriguing fact is in strong contrast with other optimization problems considered before, where just one cell suffices. As a consequence, we derive a Morse relation for SCNO, which relates the numbers of local minimizers and M-stationary points of M-index equal to one. The appearance of such saddle points cannot be thus neglected from the perspective of global optimization. Due to the multiplicity phenomenon in cell-attachment, a saddle point may lead to more than two different local minimizers. We conclude that the relatively involved structure of saddle points is the source of well-known difficulty if solving SCNO to global optimality.