BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sebastian Gröber

Sebastian Gröber contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.class-phphysics.ed-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2019arXiv

Collision of two balls in a groove -- An interplay between translation and rotation

When two identical balls collide with equal inital speed on a horizontal groove, one can observe three trajectory types depending on the groove width. To explain this observation, we derive velocity diagrams of the balls motions from Newton's laws of translation and rotation and kinematics of rigid bodies in a three-dimensional vectorial representation and compare them with experimental results. The velocity diagrams and an introduced determinant allow to discriminate between the trajectory types and to understand the interplay between translation and rotation after the collision of the balls.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Improving students' understanding of rotating frames of reference using videos from different perspectives

The concepts of the Coriolis and the centrifugal force are essential in various scientific fields and they are standard components of introductory physics lectures. In this paper we explore how students understand and apply concepts of rotating frames of reference in the context of an exemplary lecture demonstration experiment. We found in a $Predict-Observe-Explain$-setting, that after predicting the outcome prior to the demonstration, only one out of five physics students correctly reported the observation of the trajectory of a sphere rolling over a rotating disc. Despite this low score, a detailed analysis of distractors revealed significant conceptual learning during the observation of the experiment. In this context, we identified three main misconceptions and learning difficulties. First, the centrifugal force is only required to describe the trajectory if the object is coupled to the rotating system. Second, inertial forces cause a reaction of an object on which they act. And third, students systematically mix-up the trajectories in the stationary and the rotating frame of reference. Furthermore, we captured students' eye movements during the $Predict$ task and found that physics students with low confidence ratings focused longer on relevant task areas than confident students despite having a comparable score. Consequently, this metric is a helpful tool for the identification of misconceptions using eye tracking. Overall, the results help to understand the complexity of concept learning from demonstration experiments and provide important implications for instructional design of introductions to rotating frames of reference.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access