Researcher profile

Scott A. Wipperfurth

Scott A. Wipperfurth contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Radiogenic power and geoneutrino luminosity of the Earth and other terrestrial bodies through time

We report the Earth's rate of radiogenic heat production and (anti)neutrino luminosity from geologically relevant short-lived radionuclides (SLR) and long-lived radionuclides (LLR) using decay constants from the geological community, updated nuclear physics parameters, and calculations of the $β$ spectra. We track the time evolution of the radiogenic power and luminosity of the Earth over the last 4.57 billion years, assuming an absolute abundance for the refractory elements in the silicate Earth and key volatile/refractory element ratios (e.g., Fe/Al, K/U, and Rb/Sr) to set the abundance levels for the moderately volatile elements. The relevant decays for the present-day heat production in the Earth ($19.9\pm3.0$ TW) are from $^{40}$K, $^{87}$Rb, $^{147}$Sm, $^{232}$Th, $^{235}$U, and $^{238}$U. Given element concentrations in kg-element/kg-rock and density $ρ$ in kg/m$^3$, a simplified equation to calculate the present day heat production in a rock is: $$ h \, [μ\text{W m}^{-3}] = ρ\left( 3.387 \times 10^{-3}\,\text{K} + 0.01139 \,\text{Rb} + 0.04595\,\text{Sm} + 26.18\,\text{Th} + 98.29\,\text{U} \right) $$ The radiogenic heating rate of Earth-like material at Solar System formation was some 10$^3$ to 10$^4$ times greater than present-day values, largely due to decay of $^{26}$Al in the silicate fraction, which was the dominant radiogenic heat source for the first $\sim10$ Ma. Assuming instantaneous Earth formation, the upper bound on radiogenic energy supplied by the most powerful short-lived radionuclide $^{26}$Al ($t_{1/2}$ = 0.7 Ma) is 5.5$\;\times\;$10$^{31}$ J, which is comparable (within a factor of a few) to the planet's gravitational binding energy.

preprint2019arXiv

Reference Models for Lithospheric Geoneutrino Signal

Debate continues on the amount and distribution of radioactive heat producing elements (i.e., U, Th, and K) in the Earth, with estimates for mantle heat production varying by an order of magnitude. Constraints on the bulk-silicate Earth's (BSE) radiogenic power also places constraints on overall BSE composition. Geoneutrino detection is a direct measure of the Earth's decay rate of Th and U. The geoneutrino signal has contributions from the local ($\sim$40$\%$) and global ($\sim$35$\%$) continental lithosphere and the underlying inaccessible mantle ($\sim$25$\%$). Geophysical models are combined with geochemical datasets to predict the geoneutrino signal at current and future geoneutrino detectors. We propagated uncertainties, both chemical and physical, through Monte Carlo methods. Estimated total signal uncertainties are on the order of $\sim$20$\%$, proportionally with geophysical and geochemical inputs contributing $\sim$30$\%$ and $\sim$70$\%$, respectively. We find that estimated signals, calculated using CRUST2.0, CRUST1.0, and LITHO1.0, are within physical uncertainty of each other, suggesting that the choice of underlying geophysical model will not change results significantly, but will shift the central value by up to $\sim$15$\%$, depending on the crustal model and detector location. Similarly, we see no significant difference between calculated layer abundances and bulk-crustal heat production when using these geophysical models. The bulk crustal heat production is calculated as $7 \pm2$~terrawatts, which includes an increase of 1~TW in uncertainty relative to previous studies. Future improvements, including uncertainty attribution and near-field modeling, are discussed.