Source author record

Sanjeev Saxena

Sanjeev Saxena appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
3topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Edge colouring Game on Trees with maximum degree $Δ=4$

Consider the following game. We are given a tree $T$ and two players (say) Alice and Bob who alternately colour an edge of a tree (using one of $k$ colours). If all edges of the tree get coloured, then Alice wins else Bob wins. Game chromatic index of trees of is the smallest index $k$ for which there is a winning strategy for Alice. If the maximum degree of a node in tree is $Δ$, Erdos et.al.[6], show that the game chromatic index is at least $Δ+1$. The bound is known to be tight for all values of $Δ\neq 4$. In this paper we show that for $Δ=4$, even if Bob is allowed to skip a move, Alice can always choose an edge to colour and win the game for $k=Δ+1$. Thus the game chromatic index of trees of maximum degree $4$ is also $5$. Hence, game chromatic index of trees of maximum degree $Δ$ is $Δ+1$ for all $Δ\geq 2$. Moreover,the tree can be preprocessed to allow Alice to pick the next edge to colour in $O(1)$ time. A result of independent interest is a linear time algorithm for on-line edge-deletion problem on trees.

preprint2020arXiv

On seat allocation problem with multiple merit lists

In this note, we present a simpler algorithm for joint seat allocation problem in case there are two or more merit lists. In case of two lists (the current situation for Engineering seats in India), the running time of the algorithm is proportional to sum of running time for two separate (delinked) allocations. The algorithm is straight forward and natural and is not (at least directly) based on deferred acceptance algorithm of Gale and Shapley. Each person can only move higher in his or her preference list. Thus, all steps of the algorithm can be made public. This will improve transparency and trust in the system.