BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sanjeev Dhurandhar

Sanjeev Dhurandhar contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
gr-qcastro-ph.IM

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Hierarchical search for compact binary coalescences in the Advanced LIGO's first two observing runs

Detection of many compact binary coalescences (CBCs) is one of the primary goals of the present and future ground-based gravitational-wave (GW) detectors. While increasing the detectors' sensitivities will be crucial in achieving this, efficient data analysis strategies can play a vital role. With given computational power in hand, efficient data analysis techniques can expand the size and dimensionality of the parameter space to search for a variety of GW sources. Matched filtering based analyses that depend on modeled signals to produce adequate signal-to-noise ratios for signal detection may miss them if the parameter space is too restrained. Specifically, the CBC search is currently limited to non-precessing binaries only, where the spins of the components are either aligned or anti-aligned to the orbital angular momentum. A hierarchical search for CBCs is thus well motivated. The first stage of this search is performed by matched filtering coarsely sampled data with a coarse template bank to look for candidate events. These candidates are then followed up for a finer search around the vicinity of an event's parameter space. Performing such a search leads to enormous savings in computational cost. Here we report the first successful implementation of the hierarchical search as a PyCBC-based production pipeline to perform a complete analysis of LIGO observing runs. With this, we analyze Advanced LIGO's first and second observing run data. We recover all the events detected by the PyCBC (flat) search in the first GW catalog, GWTC-1, published by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration, with nearly the same significance using a scaled background. In the analysis, we get an impressive factor of 20 reduction in computation compared to the flat search. With a standard injection study, we show that the sensitivity of the hierarchical search remains comparable to the flat search within the error bars.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

The Varied Avatars of Time-delay Interferometry

Time-Delay Interferometry (TDI) is the data processing technique that cancels the large laser phase fluctuations affecting the one-way Doppler measurements made by unequal-arm space-based gravitational wave interferometers. By taking finite linear combinations of properly time-shifted Doppler measurements, laser phase fluctuations are removed at any time t and gravitational wave signals can be studied at a requisite level of sensitivity. In the past, other approaches to this problem have been proposed. Recently, matrix based approaches have been put forward; two such approaches are by Vallisneri et al. and Tinto, Dhurandhar and Joshi. In this paper we establish a close relationship between these approaches. In fact we show that the matrices involved in defining the operators in the two approaches exhibit an isomorphism and therefore in both approaches one is dealing with matrix representations of the time-delay operators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

An optimal $χ^2$ discriminator against modelled noise-transients in interferometric data in searches for binary black-hole mergers

A vitally important requirement for detecting gravitational wave (GW) signals from compact coalescing binaries (CBC) with high significance is the reduction of the false-alarm rate of the matched-filter statistic. The data from GW detectors contain transient noise artifacts, or glitches, which adversely affect the performance of search algorithms by producing false alarms. Glitches with large amplitudes can produce triggers in the SNR time-series in spite of their small overlap with the templates. This contributes to false alarms. Historically, the traditional $χ^2$ test has proved quite useful in distinguishing triggers arising from CBC signals and those caused by glitches. In a recent paper, a large class of unified $χ^2$ discriminators was formulated, along with a procedure to construct an optimal $χ^2$ discriminator, especially, when the glitches can be modeled. A large variety of glitches that often occur in GW detector data can be modeled as sine-Gaussians, with quality factor and central frequency, ($Q,f_0$), as parameters. We use Singular Value Decomposition to identify the most significant degrees of freedom in order to reduce the computational cost of our $χ^2$. Finally, we construct a $χ^2$ statistic that optimally discriminates between sine-Gaussian glitches and CBC signals. We also use Receiver-Operating-Characteristics to quantify the improvement in search sensitivity when it employs the optimal $χ^2$ compared to the traditional $χ^2$. The improvement in detection probability is by a few to several percentage points, near a false-alarm probability of a few times $10^{-3}$, and holds for binary black holes (BBHs) with component masses from several to a hundred solar masses. Moreover, the glitches that are best discriminated against are those that are like sine-Gaussians with $Q\in [25,50]$ and $f_0\in [40,80]$Hz.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Detecting gravitational waves from inspiraling binaries with a network of geographically separated detectors: coherent versus coincident strategies

We compare two strategies of multi-detector detection of compact binary inspiral signals, namely, the coincidence and the coherent for the realistic case of geographically separated detectors.We compare the performances of the methods by plotting the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for the strategies. Several results are derived analytically in order to gain insight. Simulations are performed in order to plot the ROC curves. A single astrophysical source as well as a distribution of sources is considered. We find that the coherent strategy is superior to the two coincident strategies that we consider. Remarkably, the detection probability of the coherent strategy is 50% better than the naive coincident strategy. One the other hand, difference in performance between the coherent strategy and enhanced coincident strategy is not very large. Even in this situation, it is not difficult to perform the real data analysis with the coherent strategy. The bottom line is that the coherent strategy is a good detection strategy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access