BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sandrine Katsahian

Sandrine Katsahian contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Debiasing the estimate of treatment effect on the treated with time-varying counfounders

With the increased availability of large health databases comes the opportunity of evaluating treatment effect on new data sources.Through these databases time-dependent outcomes can be analysed as events that can be measured using counting processes. Estimating average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) requires modelling of time-varying covariate and time-dependent treatment and outcome. Gran et al. proposed an easy-to-implement method based on additive intensity regression to estimate ATT. We introduce a debiased estimate of the ATT based on a generalization of the Gran's model for a potentially repeated outcome and in the presence of multiple time-dependent covariates and baseline covariates. Simulation analyses show that our corrected estimator outperforms Gran's uncorrected estimator. Our method is applied to intensive care real-life data from MIMIC-III databases to estimate vasoppressors effect on patients with sepsis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Towards Filling the Gaps around Recurrent Events in High-Dimensional Framework: Literature Review and Early Comparison

Background Study individuals may face repeated events overtime. However, there is no consensus around learning approaches to use in a high-dimensional framework for survival data (when the number of variables exceeds the number of individuals, i.e., p>n). This study aimed at identifying learning algorithms for analyzing/predicting recurrent events and at comparing them to standard statistical models in various data simulation settings. Methods A literature review (LR) was conducted to provide state-of-the-art methodology. Data were then simulated including variations of the number of variables and proportion of active variables. Learning algorithms from the LR were compared to standard methods in such simulation scheme. Evaluation measures were Harrell's concordance index (C-index), Kim's C-index and error rate for active variables. Results Seven publications were identified, consisting in four methodological studies, one application paper and two review. The broken adaptive ridge penalization and the RankDeepSurv deep neural network were used for comparison. On simulated data, the standard models failed when p>n. Penalized Andersen-Gill and frailty models outperformed, whereas RankDeepSurv reported lower performances. Conclusion As no guidelines support a specific approach, this study helps to better understand mechanisms and limits of investigated methods in such context.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access