BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sandip Roy

Sandip Roy contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Systems and Controleess.SYmath.OCComputational Complexityeess.SPmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On the Spatial Pattern of Input-Output Metrics for a Network Synchronization Process

A graph-theoretic analysis is undertaken for a compendium of input-output (transfer) metrics of a standard discrete-time linear synchronization model, including lp gains, frequency responses, frequency-band energy, and Markov parameters. We show that these transfer metrics exhibit a spatial degradation, such that they are monotonically nonincreasing along vertex cutsets away from an exogenous input. We use this spatial analysis to characterize signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in diffusive networks driven by process noise, and to develop a notion of propagation stability for dynamical networks. Finally, the formal results are illustrated through an example.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Cyber-Physical Queueing-Network Model for Risk Management in Next-Generation Emergency Response Systems

Queueing-network models are developed for enhanced and next-generation 911 (E911 and NG911) systems, which capture both their cyber-components (communications, data-processing) and physical-world-elements (call takers, vehicle dispatch). The models encompass both the call-processing and dispatch functions of 911, and can represent the interdependencies between multiple PSAPs enabled by NG911. An instantiation of the model for a future NG911 system for Charlotte, North Carolina, is developed and used to assess performance metrics. Representation of cyber-threats (e.g. Distributed Denial-of-Service attacks) within the queueing-network model is undertaken. Based on these representations, the model is used for analysis of holistic threat impacts, as a step toward risk and vulnerability assessment for future emergency response systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Complexity and Approximability of Optimal Sensor Selection and Attack for Kalman Filtering

Given a linear dynamical system affected by stochastic noise, we consider the problem of selecting an optimal set of sensors (at design-time) to minimize the trace of the steady state a priori or a posteriori error covariance of the Kalman filter, subject to certain selection budget constraints. We show the fundamental result that there is no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem. This contrasts with other classes of sensor selection problems studied in the literature, which typically pursue constant-factor approximations by leveraging greedy algorithms and submodularity (or supermodularity) of the cost function. Here, we provide a specific example showing that greedy algorithms can perform arbitrarily poorly for the problem of design-time sensor selection for Kalman filtering. We then study the problem of attacking (i.e., removing) a set of installed sensors, under predefined attack budget constraints, to maximize the trace of the steady state a priori or a posteriori error covariance of the Kalman filter. Again, we show that there is no polynomial-time constant-factor approximation algorithm for this problem, and show specifically that greedy algorithms can perform arbitrarily poorly.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Resilient Sensor Placement for Kalman Filtering in Networked Systems: Complexity and Algorithms

Given a linear dynamical system affected by noise, we study the problem of optimally placing sensors (at design-time) subject to a sensor placement budget constraint in order to minimize the trace of the steady-state error covariance of the corresponding Kalman filter. While this problem is NP-hard in general, we consider the underlying graph associated with the system dynamics matrix, and focus on the case when there is a single input at one of the nodes in the graph. We provide an optimal strategy (computed in polynomial-time) to place the sensors over the network. Next, we consider the problem of attacking (i.e., removing) the placed sensors under a sensor attack budget constraint in order to maximize the trace of the steady-state error covariance of the resulting Kalman filter. Using the insights obtained for the sensor placement problem, we provide an optimal strategy (computed in polynomial-time) to attack the placed sensors. Finally, we consider the scenario where a system designer places the sensors under a sensor placement budget constraint, and an adversary then attacks the placed sensors subject to a sensor attack budget constraint. The resilient sensor placement problem is to find a sensor placement strategy to minimize the trace of the steady-state error covariance of the Kalman filter corresponding to the sensors that survive the attack. We show that this problem is NP-hard, and provide a pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm to solve it.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access