BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Samurdhi Karunaratne

Samurdhi Karunaratne contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
eess.SP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

WiSig: A Large-Scale WiFi Signal Dataset for Receiver and Channel Agnostic RF Fingerprinting

RF fingerprinting leverages circuit-level variability of transmitters to identify them using signals they send. Signals used for identification are impacted by a wireless channel and receiver circuitry, creating additional impairments that can confuse transmitter identification. Eliminating these impairments or just evaluating them, requires data captured over a prolonged period of time, using many spatially separated transmitters and receivers. In this paper, we present WiSig; a large scale WiFi dataset containing 10 million packets captured from 174 off-the-shelf WiFi transmitters and 41 USRP receivers over 4 captures spanning a month. WiSig is publicly available, not just as raw captures, but as conveniently pre-processed subsets of limited size, along with the scripts and examples. A preliminary evaluation performed using WiSig shows that changing receivers, or using signals captured on a different day can significantly degrade a trained classifier's performance. While capturing data over more days or more receivers limits the degradation, it is not always feasible and novel data-driven approaches are needed. WiSig provides the data to develop and evaluate these approaches towards channel and receiver agnostic transmitter fingerprinting.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Deep Learning Approaches for Open Set Wireless Transmitter Authorization

Wireless signals contain transmitter specific features, which can be used to verify the identity of transmitters and assist in implementing an authentication and authorization system. Most recently, there has been wide interest in using deep learning for transmitter identification. However, the existing deep learning work has posed the problem as closed set classification, where a neural network classifies among a finite set of known transmitters. No matter how large this set is, it will not include all transmitters that exist. Malicious transmitters outside this closed set, once within communications range, can jeopardize the system security. In this paper, we propose a deep learning approach for transmitter authorization based on open set recognition. Our proposed approach identifies a set of authorized transmitters, while rejecting any other unseen transmitters by recognizing their signals as outliers. We propose three approaches for this problem and show their ability to reject signals from unauthorized transmitters on a dataset of WiFi captures. We consider the structure of training data needed, and we show that the accuracy improves by having signals from known unauthorized transmitters in the training set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Open Set Wireless Transmitter Authorization: Deep Learning Approaches and Dataset Considerations

Due to imperfections in transmitters' hardware, wireless signals can be used to verify their identity in an authorization system. While deep learning was proposed for transmitter identification, the majority of the work has focused on classification among a closed set of transmitters. Malicious transmitters outside this closed set will be misclassified, jeopardizing the authorization system. In this paper, we consider the problem of recognizing authorized transmitters and rejecting new transmitters. To address this problem, we adapt the most prominent approaches from the open set recognition and anomaly detection literature to the problem. We study how these approaches scale with the required number of authorized transmitters. We propose using a known set of unauthorized transmitters to assist the training and study its impact. The evaluation procedure takes into consideration that some transmitters might be more similar than others and nuances these effects. The robustness of the RF authorization with respect to temporal changes in fingerprints is also considered in the evaluation. When using 10 authorized and 50 known unauthorized WiFi transmitters from a publicly accessible testbed, we were able to achieve an outlier detection accuracy of 98% on the same day test set and 80% on the different day test set.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access