Researcher profile

Samuele Campitiello

Samuele Campitiello contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Toward measuring the spin of obscured supermassive black holes: a critical assessment with disk megamasers

Mass and spin are two fundamental properties of astrophysical black holes. While some established, indirect methods are adopted to measure both these properties of active galactic nuclei (AGN) when viewed relatively face-on, very few suggested methods exist to measure these properties when AGN are viewed highly inclined and potentially obscured by large amounts of gas. In this context, we explore the accuracy and performance of a recently proposed method to estimate the spin of AGN through fitting their accretion disk spectral energy distribution, when adapted for highly inclined and obscured systems, and in particular to a sample of six, local water megamasers. For these sources, both the accretion rate and inclination angle are known, allowing us to rely only on the AGN bolometric luminosity to infer their spin. Using the bolometric luminosity as a proxy for the accretion disk peak luminosity, we derive the expected bolometric luminosity as a function of spin. Then, we measure the bolometric luminosity of each source through X-ray spectroscopy, and compare it with the expected value to constrain the spin of the AGN. The quality of the constraints depend critically on the accuracy of the measured bolometric luminosity, which is difficult to estimate in heavily obscured systems. Three out of six sources do not show consistency between the expected and measured bolometric luminosities, while other three (four, when considering the [OIII] line as tracer of the bolometric luminosity) are formally consistent with high spin values. Our results suggest that this method, although promising (and possibly considered as a future calibrator for other methods) needs better observational data and further theoretical modeling to be successfully applied to obscured AGN and to infer robust results.

preprint2020arXiv

Estimating black hole masses: Accretion disk fitting versus reverberation mapping and single epoch

We selected a sample of 28 Type 1 AGNs for which a black hole mass has been inferred using the reverberation mapping technique and single epoch scaling relations. All 28 sources show clear evidence of the "Big Blue Bump" in the optical-UV band whose emission is produced by an accretion disk (AD) around a supermassive black hole. We fitted the spectrum of these sources with the relativistic thin AD model KERRBB in order to infer the black hole masses and compared them with those from Reverberation mapping and Single epoch methods, discussing the possible uncertainties linked to such a model by quantifying their weight on our results. We find that for the majority of the sources, KERRBB is a good description of the AD emission for a wide wavelength range. The overall uncertainty on the black hole mass estimated through the disk fitting procedure is $\sim 0.45$ dex (which includes the uncertainty on fitting parameters such as e.g. spin and viewing angle), comparable to the systematic uncertainty of reverberation mapping and single epoch methods; however, such an uncertainty can be $\leq 0.3$ dex if one of the parameters of the fit is well constrained. Although all of the estimates are affected by large uncertainties, the masses inferred using the three methods are compatible if the dimensionless scale factor $f$ (linked to the unknown kinematics and geometry of the Broad Line Region) is assumed to be larger than one. For the majority of the sources, the comparison between the results coming from the three methods favors small spin values. To check the goodness of the KERRBB results, we compared them with those inferred with other models, such as AGNSED, a model that also accounts for the emission originating from an X-ray corona: using two sources with a good data coverage in the X band, we find that the masses estimated with the two models differ at most by a factor of $\sim 0.2$ dex.