Source author record

Samuel Tun-Beltran

Samuel Tun-Beltran appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Inferences About the Magnetic Field Structure of a CME with Both In Situ and Faraday Rotation Constraints

On 2012 August 2, two CMEs (CME-1 and CME-2) erupted from the west limb of the Sun as viewed from Earth, and were observed in images from the white light coronagraphs on the SOHO and STEREO spacecraft. These events were also observed by the Very Large Array (VLA), which was monitoring the Sun at radio wavelengths, allowing time-dependent Faraday rotation observations to be made of both events. We use the white-light imaging and radio data to model the 3-D field geometry of both CMEs, assuming a magnetic flux rope geometry. For CME-2, we also consider 1 au in situ field measurements in the analysis, as this CME hits STEREO-A on August~6, making this the first CME with observational constraints from stereoscopic coronal imaging, radio Faraday rotation, and in situ plasma measurements combined. The imaging and in situ observations of CME-2 provide two clear predictions for the radio data; namely that VLA should observe positive rotation measures (RMs) when the radio line of sight first encounters the CME, and that the sign should reverse to negative within a couple hours. The initial positive RMs are in fact observed. The expected sign reversal is not, but the VLA data unfortunately end too soon to be sure of the significance of this discrepancy. We interpret an RM increase prior to the expected occultation time of the CME as a signature of a sheath region of deflected field ahead of the CME itself.