Source author record

Samuel Heroy

Samuel Heroy appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Are neighbourhood amenities associated with more walking and less driving? Yes, but only for the wealthy

Cities are home to a vast array of amenities, from local barbers to science museums and shopping malls. But these are inequality distributed across urban space. Using Google Places data combined with trip-based mobility data for Bogotá, Colombia, we shed light on the impact of neighbourhood amenities on urban mobility patterns. Deriving a new accessibility metric that explicitly takes into account spatial range, we find that a higher density of local amenities is associated a higher likelihood of walking as well as shorter bus and car trips. Digging deeper, we use a sample stratification framework to show that socioeconomic status (SES) modulates these effects. Amenities within about a 1km radius are strongly associated with a higher propensity to walk and lower driving time only for only the wealthiest group. In contrast, a higher density of amenities is associated with shorter bus trips for low and middle SES residents. As cities globally aim to boost public transport and green travel, these findings enable us to better understand how commercial structure shapes urban mobility in highly income-segregated settings.

preprint2020arXiv

Metropolitan-scale COVID-19 outbreaks: how similar are they?

In this study, we use US county-level COVID-19 case data from January 21-March 25, 2020 to study the exponential behavior of case growth at the metropolitan scale. In particular, we assume that all localized outbreaks are in an early stage (either undergoing exponential growth in the number of cases, or are effectively contained) and compare the explanatory performance of different simple exponential and linear growth models for different metropolitan areas. While we find no relationship between city size and exponential growth rate (directly related to $R0$, which denotes average the number of cases an infected individual infects), we do find that larger cities seem to begin exponential spreading earlier and are thus in a more advanced stage of the pandemic at the time of submission. We also use more recent data to compute prediction errors given our models, and find that in many cities, exponential growth models trained on data before March 26 are poor predictors for case numbers in this more recent period (March 26-30), likely indicating a reduction in the number of new cases facilitated through social distancing.