BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Sam Dillavou

Sam Dillavou contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.softphysics.geo-phcond-mat.dis-nnphysics.comp-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Beyond Quality and Quantity: Contact Distribution Encodes Frictional Strength

Classically, the quantity of contact area $A_R$ between two bodies is considered a proxy for the force of friction. However, bond density across the interface - quality of contact - is also relevant, and contemporary debate often centers around the relative importance of these two factors. In this work, we demonstrate that a third factor, often overlooked, plays a significant role in static frictional strength: the distribution of contact. We perform static friction measurements, $μ$, on three pairs of solid blocks while imaging the contact plane. By using linear regression on hundreds of image-$μ$ pairs, we are able to predict future friction measurements with 3 to 7 times better accuracy than existing benchmarks, including total quantity of contact area. Our model has no access to quality of contact, and we therefore conclude that a large portion of the interfacial state is encoded in the spatial distribution of contact, rather than its quality or quantity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Physical learning beyond the quasistatic limit

Physical networks, such as biological neural networks, can learn desired functions without a central processor, using local learning rules in space and time to learn in a fully distributed manner. Learning approaches such as equilibrium propagation, directed aging, and coupled learning similarly exploit local rules to accomplish learning in physical networks such as mechanical, flow, or electrical networks. In contrast to certain natural neural networks, however, such approaches have so far been restricted to the quasistatic limit, where they learn on time scales slow compared to their physical relaxation. This quasistatic constraint slows down learning, limiting the use of these methods as machine learning algorithms, and potentially restricting physical networks that could be used as learning platforms. Here we explore learning in an electrical resistor network that implements coupled learning, both in the lab and on the computer, at rates that range from slow to far above the quasistatic limit. We find that up to a critical threshold in the ratio of the learning rate to the physical rate of relaxation, learning speeds up without much change of behavior or error. Beyond the critical threshold, the error exhibits oscillatory dynamics but the networks still learn successfully.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Influences of microcontact shape on the state of a frictional interface

The real area of contact of a frictional interface changes rapidly when the normal load is altered, and evolves slowly when normal load is held constant, aging over time. Traditionally, the total area of contact is considered a proxy for the frictional strength of the interface. Here we show that the state of a frictional interface is not entirely defined by the total real area of contact but depends on the geometrical nature of that contact as well. We directly visualize an interface between rough elastomers and smooth glass and identify that normal loading and frictional aging evolve the interface differently, even at a single contact level. We introduce a protocol wherein the real area of contact is held constant in time. Under these conditions, the interface is continually evolving; small contacts shrink and large contacts coarsen.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Shear Destruction of Frictional Aging and Memory

We simultaneously measure the static friction and the real area of contact between two solid bodies. Under static conditions both quantities increase logarithmically in time, a phenomenon coined aging. Indeed, frictional strength is traditionally considered equivalent to the real area of contact. Here we show that this equivalence breaks down when a static shear load is applied during aging. The addition of such a shear load accelerates frictional aging while the aging rate of the real area of contact is unaffected. Moreover, a negative static shear - pulling instead of pushing - slows frictional aging, but similarly does not affect the aging of contacts. The origin of this shear effect on aging is geometrical. When shear load is increased, minute relative tilts between the two blocks prematurely erase interfacial memory prior to sliding, negating the effect of aging. Modifying the loading point of the interface eliminates these tilts and as a result frictional aging rate becomes insensitive to shear. We also identify a secondary memory-erasure effect that remains even when all tilts are eliminated and show that this effect can be leveraged to accelerate aging by cycling between two static shear loads.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access