BZPEER

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2016arXiv

Distinguishing Chromatic Number of Random Cayley graphs

The \textit{Distinguishing Chromatic Number} of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_D(G)$, was first defined in \cite{collins} as the minimum number of colors needed to properly color $G$ such that no non-trivial automorphism $ϕ$ of the graph $G$ fixes each color class of $G$. In this paper, we consider random Cayley graphs $Γ(A,S)$ defined over certain abelian groups $A$ and show that with probability at least $1-n^{-Ω(\log n)}$ we have, $χ_D(Γ)\leχ(Γ) + 1$.

preprint2016arXiv

The List Distinguishing Number of Kneser Graphs

A graph $G$ is said to be $k$-distinguishable if the vertex set can be colored using $k$ colors such that no non-trivial automorphism fixes every color class, and the distinguishing number $D(G)$ is the least integer $k$ for which $G$ is $k$-distinguishable. If for each $v\in V(G)$ we have a list $L(v)$ of colors, and we stipulate that the color assigned to vertex $v$ comes from its list $L(v)$ then $G$ is said to be $\mathcal{L}$-distinguishable where $\mathcal{L} =\{L(v)\}_{v\in V(G)}$. The list distinguishing number of a graph, denoted $D_l(G)$, is the minimum integer $k$ such that every collection of lists $\mathcal{L}$ with $|L(v)|=k$ admits an $\mathcal{L}$-distinguishing coloring. In this paper, we prove that $D_l(G)=D(G)$ when $G$ is a Kneser graph.

preprint2015arXiv

$χ_D(G)$, $|Aut(G)|$, and a variant of the Motion Lemma

The \textit{Distinguishing Chromatic Number} of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_D(G)$, was first defined in \cite{collins} as the minimum number of colors needed to properly color $G$ such that no non-trivial automorphism $ϕ$ of the graph $G$ fixes each color class of $G$. In this paper, 1. We prove a lemma that may be considered a variant of the Motion lemma of \cite{RS} and use this to give examples of several families of graphs which satisfy $χ_D(G)=χ(G)+1$. 2.We give an example of families of graphs that admit large automorphism groups in which every proper coloring is distinguishing. We also describe families of graphs with (relatively) very small automorphism groups which satisfy $χ_D(G)=χ(G)+1$, for arbitrarily large values of $χ(G)$. 3. We describe non-trivial families of bipartite graphs that satisfy $χ_D(G)>r$ for any positive integer $r$.

Sajith Padinhatteeri

Quick read

Decide how to stay connected

How to connect with this researcher

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

See the researcher in context

Building this graph slice

3 published item(s)

Distinguishing Chromatic Number of Random Cayley graphs

The List Distinguishing Number of Kneser Graphs

$χ_D(G)$, $|Aut(G)|$, and a variant of the Motion Lemma