Source author record

S. Saurabh

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2012arXiv

Fixed-parameter tractability of satisfying beyond the number of variables

We consider a CNF formula FF as a multiset of clauses: F={c1,...,cm}F=\{c_1,..., c_m\}. The set of variables of FF will be denoted by V(F)V(F). Let BFB_F denote the bipartite graph with partite sets V(F)V(F) and FF and with an edge between v∈V(F)v \in V(F) and c∈Fc \in F if v∈cv \in c or vˉ∈c\bar{v} \in c. The matching number ν(F)ν(F) of FF is the size of a maximum matching in BFB_F. In our main result, we prove that the following parameterization of {\sc MaxSat} (denoted by (ν(F)+k)(ν(F)+k)-\textsc{SAT}) is fixed-parameter tractable: Given a formula FF, decide whether we can satisfy at least ν(F)+kν(F)+k clauses in FF, where kk is the parameter. A formula FF is called variable-matched if ν(F)=∣V(F)∣.ν(F)=|V(F)|. Let δ(F)=∣F∣−∣V(F)∣δ(F)=|F|-|V(F)| and δ∗(F)=max⁡F′⊆Fδ(F′).δ^*(F)=\max_{F'\subseteq F} δ(F'). Our main result implies fixed-parameter tractability of {\sc MaxSat} parameterized by δ(F)δ(F) for variable-matched formulas FF; this complements related results of Kullmann (2000) and Szeider (2004) for {\sc MaxSat} parameterized by δ∗(F)δ^*(F). To obtain our main result, we reduce (ν(F)+k)(ν(F)+k)-\textsc{SAT} into the following parameterization of the {\sc Hitting Set} problem (denoted by (m−k)(m-k)-{\sc Hitting Set}): given a collection C\cal C of mm subsets of a ground set UU of nn elements, decide whether there is X⊆UX\subseteq U such that C∩X≠∅C\cap X\neq \emptyset for each C∈CC\in \cal C and ∣X∣≤m−k,|X|\le m-k, where kk is the parameter. Gutin, Jones and Yeo (2011) proved that (m−k)(m-k)-{\sc Hitting Set} is fixed-parameter tractable by obtaining an exponential kernel for the problem. We obtain two algorithms for (m−k)(m-k)-{\sc Hitting Set}: a deterministic algorithm of runtime O((2e)2k+O(log⁡2k)(m+n)O(1))O((2e)^{2k+O(\log^2 k)} (m+n)^{O(1)}) and a randomized algorithm of expected runtime O(8k+O(k)(m+n)O(1))O(8^{k+O(\sqrt{k})} (m+n)^{O(1)}). Our deterministic algorithm improves an algorithm that follows from the kernelization result of Gutin, Jones and Yeo (2011).

preprint2012arXiv

Parameterized Study of the Test Cover Problem

We carry out a systematic study of a natural covering problem, used for identification across several areas, in the realm of parameterized complexity. In the {\sc Test Cover} problem we are given a set [n]={1,...,n}[n]=\{1,...,n\} of items together with a collection, T\cal T, of distinct subsets of these items called tests. We assume that T\cal T is a test cover, i.e., for each pair of items there is a test in T\cal T containing exactly one of these items. The objective is to find a minimum size subcollection of T\cal T, which is still a test cover. The generic parameterized version of {\sc Test Cover} is denoted by p(k,n,∣T∣)p(k,n,|{\cal T}|)-{\sc Test Cover}. Here, we are given ([n],T)([n],\cal{T}) and a positive integer parameter kk as input and the objective is to decide whether there is a test cover of size at most p(k,n,∣T∣)p(k,n,|{\cal T}|). We study four parameterizations for {\sc Test Cover} and obtain the following: (a) kk-{\sc Test Cover}, and (n−k)(n-k)-{\sc Test Cover} are fixed-parameter tractable (FPT). (b) (∣T∣−k)(|{\cal T}|-k)-{\sc Test Cover} and (log⁡n+k)(\log n+k)-{\sc Test Cover} are W[1]-hard. Thus, it is unlikely that these problems are FPT.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.