BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ryan Wisnesky

Ryan Wisnesky contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Databasesmath.CTArtificial IntelligenceLogic in Computer Science

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Algebraic Property Graphs

We present a case study in applied category theory written from the point of view of an applied domain: the formalization of the widely-used property graphs data model in an enterprise setting using elementary constructions from type theory and category theory, including limit and co-limit sketches. Observing that algebraic data types are a common foundation of most of the enterprise schema languages we deal with in practice, for graph data or otherwise, we introduce a type theory for algebraic property graphs wherein the types denote both algebraic data types in the sense of functional programming and join-union E/R diagrams in the sense of database theory. We also provide theoretical foundations for graph transformation along schema mappings with by-construction guarantees of semantic consistency. Our data model originated as a formalization of a data integration toolkit developed at Uber which carries data and schemas along composable mappings between data interchange languages such as Apache Avro, Apache Thrift, and Protocol Buffers, and graph languages including RDF with OWL or SHACL-based schemas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Fast Left Kan Extensions Using The Chase

We show how computation of left Kan extensions can be reduced to computation of free models of cartesian (finite-limit) theories. We discuss how the standard and parallel chase compute weakly free models of regular theories and free models of cartesian theories, and compare the concept of "free model" with a similar concept from database theory known as "universal model". We prove that, as algorithms for computing finite free models of cartesian theories, the standard and parallel chase are complete under fairness assumptions. Finally, we describe an optimized implementation of the parallel chase specialized to left Kan extensions that achieves an order of magnitude improvement in our performance benchmarks compared to the next fastest left Kan extension algorithm we are aware of.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Informal Data Transformation Considered Harmful

In this paper we take the common position that AI systems are limited more by the integrity of the data they are learning from than the sophistication of their algorithms, and we take the uncommon position that the solution to achieving better data integrity in the enterprise is not to clean and validate data ex-post-facto whenever needed (the so-called data lake approach to data management, which can lead to data scientists spending 80% of their time cleaning data), but rather to formally and automatically guarantee that data integrity is preserved as it transformed (migrated, integrated, composed, queried, viewed, etc) throughout the enterprise, so that data and programs that depend on that data need not constantly be re-validated for every particular use.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access