Researcher profile

Ryan P. Keenan

Ryan P. Keenan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

An Intensity Mapping Constraint on the CO-Galaxy Cross Power Spectrum at Redshift ~ 3

The abundance of cold molecular gas plays a crucial role in models of galaxy evolution. While deep spectroscopic surveys of CO emission lines have been a primary tool for measuring this abundance, the difficulty of these observations has motivated alternative approaches to studying molecular gas content. One technique, line intensity mapping, seeks to constrain the average molecular gas properties of large samples of individually undetectable galaxies through the CO brightness power spectrum. Here we present constraints on the cross-power spectrum between CO intensity maps and optical galaxy catalogs. This cross-measurement allows us to check for systematic problems in CO intensity mapping data, and validate the data analysis used the auto-power spectrum measurement of the CO Power Spectrum Survey. We place a 2-sigma upper limit on the band-averaged CO-galaxy cross-power of $P_x<540$ uK Mpc$^3$/h$^3$. Our measurement favors a non-zero mean CO brightness temperature at around 90% confidence and gives an upper limit on the mean molecular gas density at z~2.6 of $7.7 \times 10^8$ Msun/Mpc$^3$. We forecast the expected cross-power spectrum by applying a number of literature prescriptions for the CO luminosity to halo mass relation to a suite of mock light cones. Under the most optimistic forecasts the cross-spectrum could be detected with only moderate extensions of the data used here, while more conservative models could be detected with a factor of 10 increase in sensitivity. Ongoing CO intensity mapping experiments will target fields allowing extensive cross correlation analysis and should reach the sensitivity required to detect the cross-spectrum signal.

preprint2021arXiv

Biases and Cosmic Variance in Molecular Gas Abundance Measurements

Recent deep millimeter-wave surveys attempt to measure the carbon monoxide (CO) luminosity function and mean molecular gas density through blind detections of CO emission lines. While the cosmic star formation rate density is now constrained in fields hundreds of arcmin$^2$ or more, molecular gas studies have been limited to $\le50$ arcmin$^2$. These small fields result in significant biases that have not been accounted for in published results. To quantify these biases, we assign CO luminosities to halos in cosmological simulations to produce mock observations for a range of field sizes. We find that fields $\lesssim 10$ arcmin$^2$ alter the recovered shape of the luminosity function, causing underestimates of the number of bright objects. Our models suggest that current surveys are sensitive enough to detect sources responsible for approximately half of the cosmic molecular gas density at high redshift. However, uncertainties in the gas density measurement are large, and cosmic variance may double the uncertainty claimed in these surveys. As a result, the field size needed to detect redshift evolution in the molecular gas at high confidence may be more than an order of magnitude larger than what current surveys have achieved. Shot power intensity mapping measurements are particularly sensitive to Poisson variance and require yet larger areas to constrain the gas density or its evolution. We provide a simple prescription for approximating uncertainty in total CO emission as a function of survey area and redshift, for both direct detection and intensity mapping surveys.