Researcher profile

Ross Cawthon

Ross Cawthon contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

The Gravitational Lensing Imprints of DES Y3 Superstructures on the CMB: A Matched Filtering Approach

$ $Low density cosmic voids gravitationally lens the cosmic microwave background (CMB), leaving a negative imprint on the CMB convergence $κ$. This effect provides insight into the distribution of matter within voids, and can also be used to study the growth of structure. We measure this lensing imprint by cross-correlating the Planck CMB lensing convergence map with voids identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data set, covering approximately 4,200 deg$^2$ of the sky. We use two distinct void-finding algorithms: a 2D void-finder which operates on the projected galaxy density field in thin redshift shells, and a new code, Voxel, which operates on the full 3D map of galaxy positions. We employ an optimal matched filtering method for cross-correlation, using the MICE N-body simulation both to establish the template for the matched filter and to calibrate detection significances. Using the DES Y3 photometric luminous red galaxy sample, we measure $A_κ$, the amplitude of the observed lensing signal relative to the simulation template, obtaining $A_κ= 1.03 \pm 0.22$ ($4.6σ$ significance) for Voxel and $A_κ= 1.02 \pm 0.17$ ($5.9σ$ significance) for 2D voids, both consistent with $Λ$CDM expectations. We additionally invert the 2D void-finding process to identify superclusters in the projected density field, for which we measure $A_κ= 0.87 \pm 0.15$ ($5.9σ$ significance). The leading source of noise in our measurements is Planck noise, implying that future data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT), South Pole Telescope (SPT) and CMB-S4 will increase sensitivity and allow for more precise measurements.

preprint2020arXiv

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances and Weak Lensing

We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for $S_8 =σ_8(Ω_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}= 0.65\pm 0.04$, driven by a low matter density parameter, $Ω_{\rm m}=0.179^{+0.031}_{-0.038}$, with $σ_8-Ω_{\rm m}$ posteriors in $2.4σ$ tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in $5.6σ$ with the Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant physics. Cross checks with X-ray and microwave data, as well as independent constraints on the observable--mass relation from SZ selected clusters, suggest that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness threshold ($λ\ge 30$) significantly reduces the tension with other probes, and points to one or more richness-dependent effects not captured by our model.

preprint2020arXiv

Effects of Redshift Uncertainty on Cross-Correlations of CMB Lensing and Galaxy Surveys

We explore the effects of incorporating redshift uncertainty into measurements of galaxy clustering and cross-correlations of galaxy positions and cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing maps. We use a simple Gaussian model for a redshift distribution in a redshift bin with two parameters: the mean, $z_0$, and the width, $σ_z$. We vary these parameters, as well as a galaxy bias parameter, $b_{\text{g}}$, and a matter fluctuations parameter, $σ_8$, for each redshift bin, as well as the parameter $Ω_{\text{m}}$, in a Fisher analysis across 12 redshift bins from $z=0-7$. We find that incorporating redshift uncertainties degrades constraints on $σ_8(z)$ in the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST)/CMB-S4 era by about a factor of 10 compared to the case of perfect redshift knowledge. In our fiducial analysis of LSST/CMB-S4 including redshift uncertainties, we project constraints on $σ_8(z)$ for $z<3$ of less than $5 \%$. Galaxy imaging surveys are expected to have priors on redshift parameters from photometric redshift algorithms and other methods. When adding priors with the expected precision for LSST redshift algorithms, the constraints on $σ_8(z)$ can be improved by a factor of 2-3 compared to the case of no prior information. We also find that `self-calibrated&#39; constraints on the redshift parameters from just the autocorrelation and cross-correlation measurements (with no prior information) are competitive with photometric redshift techniques. In the LSST/CMB-S4 era, we find uncertainty on the redshift parameters ($z_0,σ_z$) to be below 0.004(1+z) at $z<1$. For all parameters, constraints improve significantly if smaller scales can be used. We also project constraints for nearer term survey combinations, Dark Energy Survey (DES)/SPT-SZ, DES/SPT-3G, and LSST/SPT-3G, and analyze how our constraints depend on a variety of parameter and model choices.