Researcher profile

Roni Parshani

Roni Parshani contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
7works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2011arXiv

Percolation in networks composed of connectivity and dependency links

Networks composed from both connectivity and dependency links were found to be more vulnerable compared to classical networks with only connectivity links. Their percolation transition is usually of a first order compared to the second order transition found in classical networks. We analytically analyze the effect of different distributions of dependencies links on the robustness of networks. For a random Erd$\ddot{o}$s-R$\acute{e}$nyi (ER) network with average degree $k$ that is divided into dependency clusters of size $s$, the fraction of nodes that belong to the giant component, $P_\infty$, is given by $ P_\infty=p^{s-1} [1-\exp{(-kpP_\infty)}]^s $ where $1-p$ is the initial fraction of removed nodes. Our general result coincides with the known Erd$\ddot{o}$s-R$\acute{e}$nyi equation for random networks for $s=1$ and with the result of Parshani et al (PNAS, in press, 2011) for $s=2$. For networks with Poissonian distribution of dependency links we find that $P_\infty$ is given by $P_\infty = f_{k,p}(P_\infty) e^{(<s>-1)(pf_{k,p}(P_\infty)-1)}$ where $f_{k,p}(P_\infty) \equiv 1-\exp{(-kpP_\infty)}$ and $<s>$ is the mean value of the size of dependency clusters. For networks with Gaussian distribution of dependency links we show how the average and width of the distribution affect the robustness of the networks.

preprint2010arXiv

Epidemic threshold for the SIS model on networks

We derive an analytical expression for the critical infection rate r_c of the susceptible-infectious-susceptible (SIS) disease spreading model on random networks. To obtain r_c, we first calculate the probability of reinfection, pi, defined as the probability of a node to reinfect the node that had earlier infected it. We then derive r_c from pi using percolation theory. We show that pi is governed by two effects: (i) The requirement from an infecting node to recover prior to its reinfection, which depends on the disease spreading parameters; and (ii) The competition between nodes that simultaneously try to reinfect the same ancestor, which depends on the network topology.

preprint2010arXiv

Inter-similarity between coupled networks

Recent studies have shown that a system composed from several randomly interdependent networks is extremely vulnerable to random failure. However, real interdependent networks are usually not randomly interdependent, rather a pair of dependent nodes are coupled according to some regularity which we coin inter-similarity. For example, we study a system composed from an interdependent world wide port network and a world wide airport network and show that well connected ports tend to couple with well connected airports. We introduce two quantities for measuring the level of inter-similarity between networks (i) Inter degree-degree correlation (IDDC) (ii) Inter-clustering coefficient (ICC). We then show both by simulation models and by analyzing the port-airport system that as the networks become more inter-similar the system becomes significantly more robust to random failure.

preprint2010arXiv

Interdependent networks: Reducing the coupling strength leads to a change from a first to second order percolation transition

We study a system composed from two interdependent networks A and B, where a fraction of the nodes in network A depends on the nodes of network B and a fraction of the nodes in network B depends on the nodes of network A. Due to the coupling between the networks when nodes in one network fail they cause dependent nodes in the other network to also fail. This invokes an iterative cascade of failures in both networks. When a critical fraction of nodes fail the iterative process results in a percolation phase transition that completely fragments both networks. We show both analytically and numerically that reducing the coupling between the networks leads to a change from a first order percolation phase transition to a second order percolation transition at a critical point. The scaling of the percolation order parameter near the critical point is characterized by the critical exponent beta=1.

preprint2010arXiv

The critical effect of dependency groups on the function of networks

Current network models assume one type of links to define the relations between the network entities. However, many real networks can only be correctly described using two different types of relations. Connectivity links that enable the nodes to function cooperatively as a network and dependency links that bind the failure of one network element to the failure of other network elements. Here we present for the first time an analytical framework for studying the robustness of networks that include both connectivity and dependency links. We show that the synergy between the two types of failures leads to an iterative process of cascading failures that has a devastating effect on the network stability and completely alters the known assumptions regarding the robustness of networks. We present exact analytical results for the dramatic change in the network behavior when introducing dependency links. For a high density of dependency links the network disintegrates in a form of a first order phase transition while for a low density of dependency links the network disintegrates in a second order transition. Moreover, opposed to networks containing only connectivity links where a broader degree distribution results in a more robust network, when both types of links are present a broad degree distribution leads to higher vulnerability.

preprint2009arXiv

Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks

Many systems, ranging from engineering to medical to societal, can only be properly characterized by multiple interdependent networks whose normal functioning depends on one another. Failure of a fraction of nodes in one network may lead to a failure in another network. This in turn may cause further malfunction of additional nodes in the first network and so on. Such a cascade of failures, triggered by a failure of a small faction of nodes in only one network, may lead to the complete fragmentation of all networks. We introduce a model and an analytical framework for studying interdependent networks. We obtain interesting and surprising results that should significantly effect the design of robust real-world networks. For two interdependent Erdos-Renyi (ER) networks, we find that the critical average degree below which both networks collapse is <k_c>=2.445, compared to <k_c>=1 for a single ER network. Furthermore, while for a single network a broader degree distribution of the network nodes results in higher robustness to random failure, for interdependent networks, the broader the distribution is, the more vulnerable the networks become to random failure.

preprint2009arXiv

Dynamic networks and directed percolation

We introduce a model for dynamic networks, where the links or the strengths of the links change over time. We solve the model by mapping dynamic networks to the problem of directed percolation, where the direction corresponds to the evolution of the network in time. We show that the dynamic network undergoes a percolation phase transition at a critical concentration $p_c$, which decreases with the rate $r$ at which the network links are changed. The behavior near criticality is universal and independent of $r$. We find fundamental network laws are changed. (i) For Erdős-Rényi networks we find that the size of the giant component at criticality scales with the network size $N$ for all values of $r$, rather than as $N^{2/3}$. (ii) In the presence of a broad distribution of disorder, the optimal path length between two nodes in a dynamic network scales as $N^{1/2}$, compared to $N^{1/3}$ in a static network.