BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Ron Peretz

Ron Peretz appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer Science and Game Theorymath.LOmath.PRLogic in Computer Sciencemath.CAmath.CO

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

The Lipschitz Constant of Perturbed Anonymous Games

The worst-case Lipschitz constant of an $n$-player $k$-action $δ$-perturbed game, $λ(n,k,δ)$, is given an explicit probabilistic description. In the case of $k\geq 3$, $λ(n,k,δ)$ is identified with the passage probability of a certain symmetric random walk on $\mathbb Z$. In the case of $k=2$ and $n$ even, $λ(n,2,δ)$ is identified with the probability that two two i.i.d.\ Binomial random variables are equal. The remaining case, $k=2$ and $n$ odd, is bounded through the adjacent (even) values of $n$. Our characterisation implies a sharp closed form asymptotic estimate of $λ(n,k,δ)$ as $δn /k\to\infty$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Effective Martingales with Restricted Wagers

The classic model of computable randomness considers martingales that take real or rational values. Recent work by Bienvenu et al. (2012) and Teutsch (2014) shows that fundamental features of the classic model change when the martingales take integer values. We compare the prediction power of martingales whose wagers belong to three different subsets of rational numbers: (a) all rational numbers, (b) rational numbers excluding a punctured neighbourhood of 0, and (c) integers. We also consider three different success criteria: (i) accumulating an infinite amount of money, (ii) consuming an infinite amount of money, and (iii) making the accumulated capital oscillate. The nine combinations of (a)--(c) and (i)--(iii) define nine notions of computable randomness. We provide a complete characterization of the relations between these notions, and show that they form five linearly ordered classes. Our results solve outstanding questions raised in Bienvenu et al. (2012), Teutsch (2014), and Chalcraft et al. (2012), and strengthen existing results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Empirical Distribution of Equilibrium Play and Its Testing Application

We show that in any $n$-player $m$-action normal-form game, we can obtain an approximate equilibrium by sampling any mixed-action equilibrium a small number of times. We study three types of equilibria: Nash, correlated and coarse correlated. For each one of them we obtain upper and lower bounds on the number of samples required for the empirical distribution over the sampled action profiles to form an approximate equilibrium with probability close to one. These bounds imply that using a small number of samples we can test whether or not players are playing according to an approximate equilibrium, even in games where $n$ and $m$ are large. In addition, our results substantially improve previously known upper bounds on the support size of approximate equilibria in games with many players. In particular, for all the three types of equilibria we show the existence of approximate equilibrium with support size polylogarithmic in $n$ and $m$, whereas the previously best-known upper bounds were polynomial in $n$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

How to Gamble Against All Odds

A decision maker observes the evolving state of the world while constantly trying to predict the next state given the history of past states. The ability to benefit from such predictions depends not only on the ability to recognize patters in history, but also on the range of actions available to the decision maker. We assume there are two possible states of the world. The decision maker is a gambler who has to bet a certain amount of money on the bits of an announced binary sequence of states. If he makes a correct prediction he wins his wager, otherwise he loses it. We compare the power of betting strategies (aka martingales) whose wagers take values in different sets of reals. A martingale whose wagers take values in a set $A$ is called an $A$-martingale. A set of reals $B$ anticipates a set $A$, if for every $A$-martingale there is a countable set of $B$-martingales, such that on every binary sequence on which the $A$-martingale gains an infinite amount at least one of the $B$-martingales gains an infinite amount, too. We show that for two important classes of pairs of sets $A$ and $B$, $B$ anticipates $A$ if and only if the closure of $B$ contains $rA$, for some positive $r$. One class is when $A$ is bounded and $B$ is bounded away from zero; the other class is when $B$ is well ordered (has no left-accumulation points). Our results generalize several recent results in algorithmic randomness and answer a question posed by Chalcraft et al. (2012).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Approximate Nash Equilibria via Sampling

We prove that in a normal form n-player game with m actions for each player, there exists an approximate Nash equilibrium where each player randomizes uniformly among a set of O(log(m) + log(n)) pure strategies. This result induces an $N^{\log \log N}$ algorithm for computing an approximate Nash equilibrium in games where the number of actions is polynomial in the number of players (m=poly(n)), where $N=nm^n$ is the size of the game (the input size). In addition, we establish an inverse connection between the entropy of Nash equilibria in the game, and the time it takes to find such an approximate Nash equilibrium using the random sampling algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Small-Support Approximate Correlated Equilibria

We prove the existence of approximate correlated equilibrium of support size polylogarithmic in the number of players and the number of actions per player. In particular, using the probabilistic method, we show that there exists a multiset of polylogarithmic size such that the uniform distribution over this multiset forms an approximate correlated equilibrium. Along similar lines, we establish the existence of approximate coarse correlated equilibrium with logarithmic support. We complement these results by considering the computational complexity of determining small-support approximate equilibria. We show that random sampling can be used to efficiently determine an approximate coarse correlated equilibrium with logarithmic support. But, such a tight result does not hold for correlated equilibrium, i.e., sampling might generate an approximate correlated equilibrium of support size Ω(m) where m is the number of actions per player. Finally, we show that finding an exact correlated equilibrium with smallest possible support is NP-hard under Cook reductions, even in the case of two-player zero-sum games.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Hunter, Cauchy Rabbit, and Optimal Kakeya Sets

A planar set that contains a unit segment in every direction is called a Kakeya set. We relate these sets to a game of pursuit on a cycle $\Z_n$. A hunter and a rabbit move on the nodes of $\Z_n$ without seeing each other. At each step, the hunter moves to a neighbouring vertex or stays in place, while the rabbit is free to jump to any node. Adler et al (2003) provide strategies for hunter and rabbit that are optimal up to constant factors and achieve probability of capture in the first $n$ steps of order $1/\log n$. We show these strategies yield a Kakeya set consisting of $4n$ triangles with minimal area, (up to constant), namely $Θ(1/\log n)$. As far as we know, this is the first non-iterative construction of a boundary-optimal Kakeya set. Considering the continuum analog of the game yields a construction of a random Kakeya set from two independent standard Brownian motions $\{B(s): s \ge 0\}$ and $\{W(s): s \ge 0\}$. Let $τ_t:=\min\{s \ge 0: B(s)=t\}$. Then $X_t=W(τ_t)$ is a Cauchy process, and $K:=\{(a,X_t+at) : a,t \in [0,1]\}$ is a Kakeya set of zero area. The area of the $ε$-neighborhood of $K$ is as small as possible, i.e., almost surely of order $Θ(1/|\log ε|)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access