BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Ron Milo

Ron Milo appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Other Quantitative BiologyBiological PhysicsBiomoleculesphysics.soc-phPopulations and EvolutionSubcellular Processes

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

The Anthropocene by the Numbers: A Quantitative Snapshot of Humanity's Influence on the Planet

The presence and action of humans on Earth has exerted a strong influence on the evolution of the planet over the past $\approx$ 10,000 years, the consequences of which are now becoming broadly evident. Despite a deluge of tightly-focused and necessarily technical studies exploring each facet of "human impacts" on the planet, their integration into a complete picture of the human-Earth system lags far behind. Here, we quantify twelve dimensionless ratios which put the magnitude of human impacts in context, comparing the magnitude of anthropogenic processes to their natural analogues. These ratios capture the extent to which humans alter the terrestrial surface, hydrosphere, biosphere, atmosphere, and biogeochemistry of Earth. In almost all twelve cases, the impact of human processes rivals or exceeds their natural counterparts. The values and corresponding uncertainties for these impacts at global and regional resolution are drawn from the primary scientific literature, governmental and international databases, and industry reports. We present this synthesis of the current "state of affairs" as a graphical snapshot designed to be used as a reference. Furthermore, we establish a searchable database termed the Human Impacts Database (www.anthroponumbers.org) which houses all quantities reported here and many others with extensive curation and annotation. While necessarily incomplete, this work collates and contextualizes a set of essential numbers summarizing the broad impacts of human activities on Earth's atmosphere, land, water, and biota.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A quantitative compendium of COVID-19 epidemiology

Accurate numbers are needed to understand and predict viral dynamics. Curation of high-quality literature values for the infectious period duration or household secondary attack rate, for example, is especially pressing currently because these numbers inform decisions about how and when to lockdown or reopen societies. We aim to provide a curated source for the key numbers that help us understand the virus driving our current global crisis. This compendium focuses solely on COVID-19 epidemiology. The numbers reported in summary format are substantiated by annotated references. For each property, we provide a concise definition, description of measurement and inference methods, and associated caveats. We hope this compendium will make essential numbers more accessible and avoid common sources of confusion for the many newcomers to the field such as using the incubation period to denote and quantify the latent period or using the hospitalization duration for the infectiousness period duration. This document will be repeatedly updated and the community is invited to participate in improving it.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Quantitative clarification of key questions about COVID-19 epidemiology

Modeling the spread of COVID-19 is crucial for informing public health policy. All models for COVID-19 epidemiology rely on parameters describing the dynamics of the infection process. The meanings of epidemiological parameters like R_0, R_t, the "serial interval" and "generation interval" can be challenging to understand, especially as these and other parameters are conceptually overlapping and sometimes confusingly named. Moreover, the procedures used to estimate these parameters make various assumptions and use different mathematical approaches that should be understood and accounted for when relying on parameter values and reporting them to the public. Here, we offer several insights regarding the derivation of commonly-reported epidemiological parameters, and describe how mitigation measures like lockdown are expected to affect their values. We aim to present these quantitative relationships in a manner that is accessible to the widest audience possible. We hope that better communicating the intricacies of epidemiological models will improve our collective understanding of their strengths and weaknesses, and will help avoid possible pitfalls when using them.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) by the numbers

The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a harsh reminder of the fact that, whether in a single human host or a wave of infection across continents, viral dynamics is often a story about the numbers. In this snapshot, our aim is to provide a one-stop, curated graphical source for the key numbers that help us understand the virus driving our current global crisis. The discussion is framed around two broad themes: 1) the biology of the virus itself and 2) the characteristics of the infection of a single human host. Our one-page summary provides the key numbers pertaining to SARS-CoV-2, based mostly on peer-reviewed literature. The numbers reported in summary format are substantiated by the annotated references below. Readers are urged to remember that much uncertainty remains and knowledge of this pandemic and the virus driving it is rapidly evolving. In the paragraphs below we provide "back of the envelope" calculations that exemplify the insights that can be gained from knowing some key numbers and using quantitative logic. These calculations serve to improve our intuition through sanity checks, but do not replace detailed epidemiological analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2017arXiv

The Energetic Cost of Building a Virus

Viruses are incapable of autonomous energy production. Although many experimental studies make it clear that viruses are parasitic entities that hijack the host's molecular resources, a detailed estimate for the energetic cost of viral synthesis is largely lacking. To quantify the energetic cost of viruses to their hosts, we enumerated the costs associated with two very distinct but representative DNA and RNA viruses, namely T4 and influenza. We found that for these viruses, translation of viral proteins is the most energetically expensive process. Interestingly, the cost of building a T4 phage and a single influenza virus are nearly the same. Due to influenza's higher burst size, however, the overall cost of a T4 phage infection is only 2-3% of the cost of an influenza infection. The costs of these infections relative to their host's estimated energy budget during the infection reveal that a T4 infection consumes about a third of its host's energy budget, where as an influenza infection consumes only 1%. Building on our estimates for T4, we show how the energetic costs of double-stranded DNA viruses scale with virus size, revealing that the dominant cost of building a virus can switch from translation to genome replication above a critical virus size. Lastly, using our predictions for the energetic cost of viruses, we provide estimates for the strengths of selection and genetic drift acting on newly incorporated genetic elements in viral genomes, under conditions of energy limitation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Cross-species analysis traces adaptation of Rubisco towards optimality in a low dimensional landscape

Rubisco, probably the most abundant protein in the biosphere, performs an essential part in the process of carbon fixation through photosynthesis thus facilitating life on earth. Despite the significant effect that Rubisco has on the fitness of plants and other photosynthetic organisms, this enzyme is known to have a remarkably low catalytic rate and a tendency to confuse its substrate, carbon dioxide, with oxygen. This apparent inefficiency is puzzling and raises questions regarding the roles of evolution versus biochemical constraints in shaping Rubisco. Here we examine these questions by analyzing the measured kinetic parameters of Rubisco from various organisms in various environments. The analysis presented here suggests that the evolution of Rubisco is confined to an effectively one-dimensional landscape, which is manifested in simple power law correlations between its kinetic parameters. Within this one dimensional landscape, which may represent biochemical and structural constraints, Rubisco appears to be tuned to the intracellular environment in which it resides such that the net photosynthesis rate is nearly optimal. Our analysis indicates that the specificity of Rubisco is not the main determinant of its efficiency but rather the tradeoff between the carboxylation velocity and CO2 affinity. As a result, the presence of oxygen has only moderate effect on the optimal performance of Rubisco, which is determined mostly by the local CO2 concentration. Rubisco appears as an experimentally testable example for the evolution of proteins subject both to strong selection pressure and to biochemical constraints which strongly confine the evolutionary plasticity to a low dimensional landscape.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access