BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Roee Gutman

Roee Gutman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Methodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

A Bayesian Multi-Layered Record Linkage Procedure to Analyze Functional Status of Medicare Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Understanding the association between injury severity and patients' potential for recovery is crucial to providing better care for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Estimation of this relationship requires clinical information on injury severity, patient demographics, and healthcare utilization, which are often obtained from separate data sources. Because of privacy and confidentiality regulations, these data sources do not include unique identifiers to link records across data sources. Record linkage is a process to identify records that represent the same entity across data sources in the absence of unique identifiers. These processes commonly rely on agreement between variables that appear in both data sources to link records. However, when the number of records in each file is large, this task is computationally intensive and may result in false links. Blocking is a data partitioning technique that reduces the number of possible links that should be considered. Healthcare providers can be used as blocks in applications of record linkage with healthcare datasets. However, providers may not be uniquely identified across files. We propose a Bayesian record linkage procedure that simultaneously performs block-level and record-level linkage. This iterative approach incorporates the record-level linkage within block pairs to improve the accuracy of the block-level linkage. Subsequently, the algorithm improves record-level linkage using the accurate partitioning of the linkage space through blocking. We demonstrate that our proposed method provides improved performance compared to existing Bayesian record linkage methods that do not incorporate blocking. The proposed procedure is then used to merge registry data from the National Trauma Data Bank with Medicare claims data to estimate the relationship between injury severity and TBI patients' recovery.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Approximate Bayesian Bootstrap Procedures to Estimate Multilevel Treatment Effects in Observational Studies with Application to Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Regimens

Randomized clinical trials are considered the gold standard for estimating causal effects. Nevertheless, in studies that are aimed at examining adverse effects of interventions, such trials are often impractical because of ethical and financial considerations. In observational studies, matching on the generalized propensity scores was proposed as a possible solution to estimate the treatment effects of multiple interventions. However, the derivation of point and interval estimates for these matching procedures can become complex with non-continuous or censored outcomes. We propose a novel Approximate Bayesian Bootstrap algorithm that result in statistically valid point and interval estimates of the treatment effects with categorical outcomes. The procedure relies on the estimated generalized propensity scores and multiply imputes the unobserved potential outcomes for each unit. In addition, we describe a corresponding interpretable sensitivity analysis to examine the unconfoundedness assumption. We apply this approach to examines the cardiovascular safety of common, real-world anti-diabetic treatment regimens for Type 2 diabetes mellitus in a large observational database.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Development of a Common Patient Assessment Scale across the Continuum of Care: A Nested Multiple Imputation Approach

Evaluating and tracking patients' functional status through the post-acute care continuum requires a common instrument. However, different post-acute service providers such as nursing homes, inpatient rehabilitation facilities and home health agencies rely on different instruments to evaluate patients' functional status. These instruments assess similar functional status domains, but they comprise different activities, rating scales and scoring instructions. These differences hinder the comparison of patients' assessments across health care settings. We propose a two-step procedure that combines nested multiple imputation with the multivariate ordinal probit (MVOP) model to obtain a common patient assessment scale across the post-acute care continuum. Our procedure imputes the unmeasured assessments at multiple assessment dates and enables evaluation and comparison of the rates of functional improvement experienced by patients treated in different health care settings using a common measure. To generate multiple imputations of the unmeasured assessments using the MVOP model, a likelihood-based approach that combines the EM algorithm and the bootstrap method as well as a fully Bayesian approach using the data augmentation algorithm are developed. Using a dataset on patients who suffered a stroke, we simulate missing assessments and compare the MVOP model to existing methods for imputing incomplete multivariate ordinal variables. We show that, for all of the estimands considered, and in most of the experimental conditions that were examined, the MVOP model appears to be superior. The proposed procedure is then applied to patients who suffered a stroke and were released from rehabilitation facilities either to skilled nursing facilities or to their homes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Estimating the average treatment effects of nutritional label use using subclassification with regression adjustment

Propensity score methods are common for estimating a binary treatment effect when treatment assignment is not randomized. When exposure is measured on an ordinal scale (i.e., low - medium - high), however, propensity score inference requires extensions which have received limited attention. Estimands of possible interest with an ordinal exposure are the average treatment effects between each pair of exposure levels. Using these estimands, it is possible to determine an optimal exposure level. Traditional methods, including dichotomization of the exposure or a series of binary propensity score comparisons across exposure pairs, are generally inadequate for identification of optimal levels.We combine subclassification with regression adjustment to estimate transitive, unbiased average causal effects across an ordered exposure, and apply our method on the 2005-06 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to estimate the effects of nutritional label use on body mass index.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access