BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Robert S. Eisenberg

Robert S. Eisenberg appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Biological PhysicsBiomoleculesphysics.chem-phphysics.class-phcond-mat.softphysics.comp-phphysics.gen-phphysics.hist-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
8topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Maxwell's Current in Mitochondria and Nerve

Maxwell defined a true or total current in a way not widely used today. He said "... true electric current ... is not the same thing as the current of conduction but that the time-variation of the electric displacement must be taken into account in estimating the total movement of electricity". We show that true or total current is a universal property of electrodynamics independent of properties of matter. We use mathematics without a dielectric constant. The resulting Maxwell Current Law is a generalization of the Kirchhoff Law of Current used in circuit analysis, that also includes displacement current. The generalization is not a long-time low frequency approximation in contrast to traditional presentation of Kirchhoff's Law. The Maxwell Current Law does not require currents to be in circuits. It has been applied to three dimensional systems like the signaling system of nerve and muscle fibers. The Maxwell Current Law clarifies the flow of electrons, protons, and ions in mitochondria that generate ATP, the molecule that stores chemical energy throughout life. The currents are globally coupled because mitochondria are short. Focusing on Maxwell current reinterprets the classical chemiosmotic hypothesis of ATP production. The conduction current of protons in mitochondria is driven by the protonmotive force including its component electrical potential, just as in the classical chemiosmotic hypothesis. The electrical potential is now the electrical potential as defined in physical sciences by Maxwell partial differential equations. The conduction current is now just a part of the true current analyzed by Maxwell. Details of accumulation of charges do not have to be considered in analysis of true current because true current does not accumulate. It is true total current that provides the energy that generates the ATP, not just the protonmotive force.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Energetic Controls are Essential: New and Notable Note for Biophysical Journal

Mikhail Shapiro's lab investigated a promising new method for non-invasive control of calcium currents in individual cells in the nervous system by the selective heating of nanoparticles and show that simple physical laws, properly applied, explain what is happening, and so can be a foundation for constructing improved methods and techniques. They use custom built instrumentation and detailed quantitative measurement to show that special surface properties are not needed to explain their results. Their work is taken as an example of the need for quantitative measurement in biophysics and biology in general. Classical examples are cited and the argument is made that the success of structural and molecular biology has hidden the need for quantitative measurements and controls. Semiconductor and computational electronics is cited as a science even more successful than structural and molecular biology that depends on quantitative measurement, controls, and analysis.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Maxwell Equations without a Polarization Field using a paradigm from biophysics

Electrodynamics is usually written with a polarization vector field to describe the response of matter to electric fields, or more specifically, to describe changes in distribution of charge as an electric field is changed. This approach does not allow unique specification of a polarization field from measurements of electric and magnetic fields. Many polarization fields produce the same electric and magnetic fields, because only the divergence of the polarization enters Maxwell's first equation, relating charge and electric field. The curl of any function can be added to a polarization field without changing the electric field at all. The divergence of the curl is always zero. Models of structures that produce polarization cannot be uniquely determined from electrical measurements for the same reason. Models must describe charge distribution not just distribution of polarization to be unique. I propose a different paradigm to describe field dependent charge, i.e., to describe the phenomena of polarization. I propose an operational definition of polarization that has worked well in biophysics where a field dependent, time dependent polarization provides the gating current that makes neuronal sodium and potassium channels respond to voltage. The operational definition has been applied successfully to experiments for nearly fifty years. Estimates of polarization have been computed from simulations, models, and theories using this definition and they fit experimental data quite well. I propose that the same operational definition be used to define polarization charge in experiments, models, computations, theories, and simulations of other systems. Charge movement needs to be computed from a combination of electrodynamics and mechanics because 'everything interacts with everything else'. The classical polarization field need not enter into that treatment at all.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

On the Polarization of Ligands by Proteins

Although ligand-binding sites in many proteins contain a high number density of charged side chains that can polarize small organic molecules and influence binding, the magnitude of this effect has not been studied in many systems. Here, we use a quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) approach in which the ligand is the QM region to compute the ligand polarization energy of 286 protein-ligand complexes from the PDBBind Core Set (release 2016). We observe that the ligand polarization energy is linearly correlated with the magnitude of the electric field acting on the ligand, the magnitude of the induced dipole moment, and the classical polarization energy. The influence of protein and cation charges on the ligand polarization diminishes with the distance and is below 2 kcal/mol at 9 $\unicode{x212B}$ and 1 kcal/mol at 12 $\unicode{x212B}$. Considering both polarization and solvation appears essential to computing negative binding energies in some crystallographic complexes. Solvation, but not polarization, is essential for achieving moderate correlation with experimental binding free energies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Updating Maxwell with Electrons, Charge, and More Realistic Polarization

Maxwell's equations describe the relation of charge and electric force almost perfectly even though electrons and permanent charge were not in his equations, as he wrote them. For Maxwell, all charge depended on electric field. Charge was induced and polarization was described by a single dielectric constant. Electrons, permanent charge, and polarization are important when matter is involved. Polarization of matter cannot be described by a single dielectric constant ${\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{r}}$ with reasonable realism today. Only vacuum is well described by a single dielectric constant ${\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{0}}$. Here, Maxwell's equations are rewritten to include permanent charge and any type of polarization. Rewriting is in one sense petty, and in another sense profound, in either case presumptuous. Rewriting confirms the legitimacy of electrodynamics. One cannot be sure ahead of time that a theory of electrodynamics without electrons or permanent charge (like Maxwell's equations as he wrote them) would be legitimate or not. After all, a theory cannot calculate the fields produced by charges (for example, electrons) that are not in the theory at all! After updating: (1) Maxwell's equations seem universal and exact. (2) Polarization must be described explicitly to use Maxwell`s equations in applications. (3) Conservation of total current (including displacement current ${\varepsilon }_{\mathrm{0\\ }}\frac{\mathrm{\partial }\boldsymbol{\mathrm{E}}}{\mathrm{\partial }t}$) becomes exact, independent of matter, allowing precise definition of electromotive force EMF in circuits.(4) Kirchhoff's current law becomes as exact as Maxwell`s equations themselves. (5) Conservation of total current needs to be satisfied in a wide variety of systems where it has not traditionally received much attention. (6) Classical chemical kinetics is seen to need revision to conserve current.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

An Efficient Algorithm for Classical Density Functional Theory in Three Dimensions: Ionic Solutions

Classical density functional theory (DFT) of fluids is a valuable tool to analyze inhomogeneous fluids. However, few numerical solution algorithms for three-dimensional systems exist. Here we present an efficient numerical scheme for fluids of charged, hard spheres that uses $\mathcal{O}(N\log N)$ operations and $\mathcal{O}(N)$ memory, where $N$ is the number of grid points. This system-size scaling is significant because of the very large $N$ required for three-dimensional systems. The algorithm uses fast Fourier transforms (FFT) to evaluate the convolutions of the DFT Euler-Lagrange equations and Picard (iterative substitution) iteration with line search to solve the equations. The pros and cons of this FFT/Picard technique are compared to those of alternative solution methods that use real-space integration of the convolutions instead of FFTs and Newton iteration instead of Picard. For the hard-sphere DFT we use Fundamental Measure Theory. For the electrostatic DFT we present two algorithms. One is for the \textquotedblleft bulk-fluid\textquotedblright functional of Rosenfeld [Y. Rosenfeld. \textit{J. Chem. Phys.} 98, 8126 (1993)] that uses $\mathcal{O}(N\log N)$ operations. The other is for the \textquotedblleft reference fluid density\textquotedblright (RFD) functional [D. Gillespie et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 14, 12129 (2002)]. This functional is significantly more accurate than the bulk-fluid functional, but the RFD algorithm requires $\mathcal{O}(N^{2})$ operations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access