BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Robert Pepperell

Robert Pepperell appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
Computer VisionGraphicsHuman-Computer InteractionNeurons and Cognition

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
4topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Toward Quantifying Ambiguities in Artistic Images

It has long been hypothesized that perceptual ambiguities play an important role in aesthetic experience: a work with some ambiguity engages a viewer more than one that does not. However, current frameworks for testing this theory are limited by the availability of stimuli and data collection methods. This paper presents an approach to measuring the perceptual ambiguity of a collection of images. Crowdworkers are asked to describe image content, after different viewing durations. Experiments are performed using images created with Generative Adversarial Networks, using the Artbreeder website. We show that text processing of viewer responses can provide a fine-grained way to measure and describe image ambiguities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Vision as an Energy-Driven Process

It is frequently assumed that the fundamental purpose of vision is to extract information from light and process it in the brain in order to gain knowledge about environmental objects. Treating vision as an information-driven process has been fruitful for many areas of vision science. But this approach has inherent limitations and may not be sufficient to explain at the most fundamental level why and how we see. Energy is a prime mover in the evolution and operation of all biological systems, including vision, and early researchers in physiological optics and experimental psychology regarded vision as an energy-driven process. Yet to date there has been little attempt to analyze the fundamentals of vision in energetic terms. This paper is a provisional attempt to sketch an account of the early stages of vision as an energy-driven process. On this account, vision is a form of biological work in which energy from the environment is absorbed and processed by neurobiological systems in order to guide behaviour. Evidence from the evolution and neurobiology of vision is presented in support of this approach. I conclude that treating vision as an energy-driven process can contribute to our understanding of its fundamental nature and operation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access