BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Robert M. Corless

Robert M. Corless contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.HOmath.NANumerical Analysismath.APmath.COmath.DSSymbolic Computation

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Bohemian Matrix Geometry

A Bohemian matrix family is a set of matrices all of whose entries are drawn from a fixed, usually discrete and hence bounded, subset of a field of characteristic zero. Originally these were integers -- hence the name, from the acronym BOunded HEight Matrix of Integers (BOHEMI) -- but other kinds of entries are also interesting. Some kinds of questions about Bohemian matrices can be answered by numerical computation, but sometimes exact computation is better. In this paper we explore some Bohemian families (symmetric, upper Hessenberg, or Toeplitz) computationally, and answer some open questions posed about the distributions of eigenvalue densities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Fractal Eigenvector

The recursively-constructed family of Mandelbrot matrices $M_n$ for $n=1$, $2$, $\ldots$ have nonnegative entries (indeed just $0$ and $1$, so each $M_n$ can be called a binary matrix) and have eigenvalues whose negatives $-λ= c$ give periodic orbits under the Mandelbrot iteration, namely $z_k = z_{k-1}^2+c$ with $z_0=0$, and are thus contained in the Mandelbrot set. By the Perron--Frobenius theorem, the matrices $M_n$ have a dominant real positive eigenvalue, which we call $ρ_n$. This article examines the eigenvector belonging to that dominant eigenvalue and its fractal-like structure, and similarly examines (with less success) the dominant singular vectors of $M_n$ from the singular value decomposition.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Equivalences for Linearizations of Matrix Polynomials

One useful standard method to compute eigenvalues of matrix polynomials ${\bf P}(z) \in \mathbb{C}^{n\times n}[z]$ of degree at most $\ell$ in $z$ (denoted of grade $\ell$, for short) is to first transform ${\bf P}(z)$ to an equivalent linear matrix polynomial ${\bf L}(z)=z{\bf B}-{\bf A}$, called a companion pencil, where ${\bf A}$ and ${\bf B}$ are usually of larger dimension than ${\bf P}(z)$ but ${\bf L}(z)$ is now only of grade $1$ in $z$. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of ${\bf L}(z)$ can be computed numerically by, for instance, the QZ algorithm. The eigenvectors of ${\bf P}(z)$, including those for infinite eigenvalues, can also be recovered from eigenvectors of ${\bf L}(z)$ if ${\bf L}(z)$ is what is called a "strong linearization" of ${\bf P}(z)$. In this paper we show how to use algorithms for computing the Hermite Normal Form of a companion matrix for a scalar polynomial to direct the discovery of unimodular matrix polynomial cofactors ${\bf E}(z)$ and ${\bf F}(z)$ which, via the equation ${\bf E}(z){\bf L}(z){\bf F}(z) = \mathrm{diag}( {\bf P}(z), {\bf I}_n, \ldots, {\bf I}_n)$, explicitly show the equivalence of ${\bf P}(z)$ and ${\bf L}(z)$. By this method we give new explicit constructions for several linearizations using different polynomial bases. We contrast these new unimodular pairs with those constructed by strict equivalence, some of which are also new to this paper. We discuss the limitations of this experimental, computational discovery method of finding unimodular cofactors.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Inverse Cubic Iteration

There are thousands of papers on rootfinding for nonlinear scalar equations. Here is one more, to talk about an apparently new method, which I call ``Inverse Cubic Iteration'' (ICI) in analogy to the Inverse Quadratic Iteration in Richard Brent's zeroin method. The possibly new method is based on a cubic blend of tangent-line approximations for the inverse function. We rewrite this iteration for numerical stability as an average of two Newton steps and a secant step: only one new function evaluation and derivative evaluation is needed for each step. The total cost of the method is therefore only trivially more than Newton's method, and we will see that it has order $1+\sqrt{3} = 2.732...$, thus ensuring that to achieve a given accuracy it usually takes fewer steps than Newton's method while using essentially the same effort per step.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Teaching Programming for Mathematical Scientists

Over the past thirty years or so the authors have been teaching various programming for mathematics courses at our respective Universities, as well as incorporating computer algebra and numerical computation into traditional mathematics courses. These activities are, in some important ways, natural precursors to the use of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics Education. This paper reflects on some of our course designs and experiences and is therefore a mix of theory and practice. Underlying both is a clear recognition of the value of computer programming for mathematics education. We use this theory and practice to suggest good techniques for and to raise questions about the use of AI in Mathematics Education.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access