BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Robert Graubohm

Robert Graubohm appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
eess.SYHuman-Computer InteractionSystems and Control

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Taxonomy to Unify Fault Tolerance Regimes for Automotive Systems: Defining Fail-Operational, Fail-Degraded, and Fail-Safe

This paper presents a taxonomy that allows defining the fault tolerance regimes fail-operational, fail-degraded, and fail-safe in the context of automotive systems. Fault tolerance regimes such as these are widely used in recent publications related to automated driving, yet without definitions. This largely holds true for automotive safety standards, too. We show that fault tolerance regimes defined in scientific publications related to the automotive domain are partially ambiguous as well as taxonomically unrelated. The presented taxonomy is based on terminology stemming from ISO 26262 as well as from systems engineering. It uses four criteria to distinguish fault tolerance regimes. In addition to fail-operational, fail-degraded, and fail-safe, the core terminology consists of operational and fail-unsafe. These terms are supported by definitions of available performance, nominal performance, functionality, and a concise definition of the safe state. For verification, we show by means of two examples from the automotive domain that the taxonomy can be applied to hierarchical systems of different complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Compensating for the Absence of a Required Accompanying Person: A Draft of a Functional System Architecture for an Automated Vehicle

A major challenge in the development of a fully automated vehicle is to enable a large variety of users to use the vehicle independently and safely. Particular demands arise from user groups who rely on human assistance when using conventional cars. For the independent use of a vehicle by such groups, the vehicle must compensate for the absence of an accompanying person, whose actions and decisions ensure the accompanied person's safety even in unknown situations. The resulting requirements cannot be fulfilled only by the geometric design of the vehicle and the nature of its control elements. Special user needs must be taken into account in the entire automation of the vehicle. In this paper, we describe requirements for compensating for the absence of an accompanying person and show how required functions can be located in a hierarchical functional system architecture of an automated vehicle. In addition, we outline the relevance of the vehicle's operational design domain in this context and present a use case for the described functionalities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access