Source author record

Robert G. Staudte

Robert G. Staudte appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Methodology

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

1topics

2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

An efficient estimator of the parameters of the Generalized Lambda Distribution

Estimation of the four generalized lambda distribution parameters is not straightforward, and available estimators that perform best have large computation times. In this paper, we introduce a simple two-step estimator of the parameters that is comparatively very quick to compute and performs well when compared with other methods. This computational efficiency makes the use of bootstrapping to obtain interval estimators for the parameters possible. Simulations are used to assess the performance of the new estimators and applications to several data sets are included.

preprint2020arXiv

Insights and inference for the proportion below the relative poverty line

We examine a commonly used relative poverty measure called the headcount ratio ($H_p$), defined to be the proportion of incomes falling below the relative poverty line, which is defined to be a fraction $p$ of the median income. We do this by considering this concept for theoretical income populations, and its potential for determining actual changes following transfer of incomes from the wealthy to those whose incomes fall below the relative poverty line. In the process we derive and evaluate the performance of large sample confidence intervals for $H_p$. Finally, we illustrate the estimators on real income data sets.

preprint2015arXiv

Meta-analysis of ratios of sample variances

When conducting a meta-analysis of standardized mean differences (SMDs), it is common to assume equal variances in the two arms of each study. This leads to Cohen's $d$ estimates for which interpretation is simple. However, this simplicity should not be used as a justification for the assumption of equal variances in situations where evidence may suggest that it is incorrect. Until now, researchers have either used an $F$-test for each individual study as a justification for the equality of variances or perhaps even conveniently ignored such tools altogether. In this paper we propose using a meta-analysis of F-test statistics to estimate the ratio of variances prior to the combination of SMD's. This procedure allows some studies to be included that might otherwise be omitted by individual fixed level tests for unequal variances, sometimes occur even when the assumption of equal variances holds. The estimated ratio of variances, as well as associated confidence intervals, can be used as guidance as to whether the assumption of equal variances is violated. The estimators considered include variance stabilization transformations (VST) of the $F$-test statistics as well as MLE estimators. The VST approaches enable the use of QQ-plots to visually inspect for violations of equal variances while the MLE estimator easily allows for the introduction of a random effect. When there is evidence of unequal variances, this work provides a means to formally justify the use of less common methods such as log ratio of means when studies are measured on a different scale.