Source author record

Rico G. Visser

Rico G. Visser appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Prograde spin-up during gravitational collapse

Asteroids, planets, stars in some open clusters, as well as molecular clouds appear to possess a preferential spin-orbit alignment, pointing to shared processes that tie their rotation at birth to larger parent structures. We present a new mechanism that describes how collections of particles or 'clouds' gain a prograde rotational component when they collapse or contract while subject to an external, central force. The effect is geometric in origin, as relative shear on curved orbits moves their shared center-of-mass slightly inward and toward the external potential during a collapse, exchanging orbital angular momentum into aligned (prograde) rotation. We perform illustrative analytical and N-body calculations to show that this process of prograde spin-up proceeds quadratically in time ($δL_\mathrm{rot} \propto t^2$) until the collapse nears completion. The total rotational gain increases with the size of the cloud prior to its collapse: $δL_\mathrm{rot}/L_\mathrm{H} \propto (R_\mathrm{cl}/R_\mathrm{H})^5$, and typically with distance to the source of the potential ($L_\mathrm{H}\propto r_0)$. For clouds that form at the interface of shear and self-gravity ($R_\mathrm{cl} \sim R_\mathrm{H}$), prograde spin-up means that even setups with large initial retrograde rotation collapse to form prograde-spinning objects. Being a geometric effect, prograde spin-up persists around any central potential that triggers shear, even those where the shear is strongly retrograde. We highlight an application to the Solar System, where prograde spin-up can explain the frequency of binary objects in the Kuiper belt with prograde rotation.

preprint2015arXiv

On the growth of pebble-accreting planetesimals

Pebble accretion is a new mechanism to quickly grow the cores of planets. In pebble accretion, gravity and gas drag conspire to yield large collisional cross sections for small particles in protoplanetary disks. However, before pebble accretion commences, aerodynamical deflection may act to prevent planetesimals from becoming large, because particles tend to follow gas streamlines. We derive the planetesimal radius where pebble accretion is initiated and determine the growth timescales of planetesimals by sweepup of small particles. We obtain the collision efficiency factor as the ratio of the numerically-obtained collisional cross section to the planetesimal surface area, from which we obtain the growth timescales. Integrations are conducted in the potential flow limit (steady, inviscid) and in the Stokes flow regime (steady, viscid). Only particles of stopping time $t_s \ll t_X$ where $t_X\approx10^3$ s experience aerodynamic deflection. Even in that case, the planetesimal's gravity always ensures positive collision factors. The maximum growth timescale occurs typically at around $R\approx100 \ \mathrm{km}$, but is less for colder disks, corresponding to interactions shifting to the Safronov focusing regime. For particles $t_s \gg t_X$ pebble accretion commences only after this phase and is characterized by a steep drop in growth timescales. Consequently, at distances beyond ~10 AU sweepup growth timescales are always longer than $10$ Myr, while in the inner disk (~<3 AU) the viability of the sweepup scenario is determined by the outcome of pebble-planetesimal collisions in the geometric regime. We present analytical fits for the collision efficiency factors and the minimum planetesimal size needed for pebble accretion. (Abridged)