BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Richard K. Darst

Richard K. Darst contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phSocial and Information Networkscond-mat.stat-mechInformation RetrievalQuantitative Methods

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Algorithm independent bounds on community detection problems and associated transitions in stochastic block model graphs

We derive rigorous bounds for well-defined community structure in complex networks for a stochastic block model (SBM) benchmark. In particular, we analyze the effect of inter-community "noise" (inter-community edges) on any "community detection" algorithm's ability to correctly group nodes assigned to a planted partition, a problem which has been proven to be NP complete in a standard rendition. Our result does not rely on the use of any one particular algorithm nor on the analysis of the limitations of inference. Rather, we turn the problem on its head and work backwards to examine when, in the first place, well defined structure may exist in SBMs.The method that we introduce here could potentially be applied to other computational problems. The objective of community detection algorithms is to partition a given network into optimally disjoint subgraphs (or communities). Similar to k-SAT and other combinatorial optimization problems, "community detection" exhibits different phases. Networks that lie in the "unsolvable phase" lack well-defined structure and thus have no partition that is meaningful. Solvable systems splinter into two disparate phases: those in the "hard" phase and those in the "easy" phase. As befits its name, within the easy phase, a partition is easy to achieve by known algorithms. When a network lies in the hard phase, it still has an underlying structure yet finding a meaningful partition which can be checked in polynomial time requires an exhaustive computational effort that rapidly increases with the size of the graph. When taken together, (i) the rigorous results that we report here on when graphs have an underlying structure and (ii) recent results concerning the limits of rather general algorithms, suggest bounds on the hard phase.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Community detection in networks: Structural communities versus ground truth

Algorithms to find communities in networks rely just on structural information and search for cohesive subsets of nodes. On the other hand, most scholars implicitly or explicitly assume that structural communities represent groups of nodes with similar (non-topological) properties or functions. This hypothesis could not be verified, so far, because of the lack of network datasets with information on the classification of the nodes. We show that traditional community detection methods fail to find the metadata groups in many large networks. Our results show that there is a marked separation between structural communities and metadata groups, in line with recent findings. That means that either our current modeling of community structure has to be substantially modified, or that metadata groups may not be recoverable from topology alone.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Improving the performance of algorithms to find communities in networks

Many algorithms to detect communities in networks typically work without any information on the cluster structure to be found, as one has no a priori knowledge of it, in general. Not surprisingly, knowing some features of the unknown partition could help its identification, yielding an improvement of the performance of the method. Here we show that, if the number of clusters were known beforehand, standard methods, like modularity optimization, would considerably gain in accuracy, mitigating the severe resolution bias that undermines the reliability of the results of the original unconstrained version. The number of clusters can be inferred from the spectra of the recently introduced non-backtracking and flow matrices, even in benchmark graphs with realistic community structure. The limit of such two-step procedure is the overhead of the computation of the spectra.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Triadic closure as a basic generating mechanism of communities in complex networks

Most of the complex social, technological and biological networks have a significant community structure. Therefore the community structure of complex networks has to be considered as a universal property, together with the much explored small-world and scale-free properties of these networks. Despite the large interest in characterizing the community structures of real networks, not enough attention has been devoted to the detection of universal mechanisms able to spontaneously generate networks with communities. Triadic closure is a natural mechanism to make new connections, especially in social networks. Here we show that models of network growth based on simple triadic closure naturally lead to the emergence of community structure, together with fat-tailed distributions of node degree, high clustering coefficients. Communities emerge from the initial stochastic heterogeneity in the concentration of links, followed by a cycle of growth and fragmentation. Communities are the more pronounced, the sparser the graph, and disappear for high values of link density and randomness in the attachment procedure. By introducing a fitness-based link attractivity for the nodes, we find a novel phase transition, where communities disappear for high heterogeneity of the fitness distribution, but a new mesoscopic organization of the nodes emerges, with groups of nodes being shared between just a few superhubs, which attract most of the links of the system.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Dynamical Heterogeneity in Lattice Glass Models

In this paper we consider in detail the properties of dynamical heterogeneity in lattice glass models (LGMs). LGMs are lattice models whose dynamical rules are based on thermodynamic, as opposed to purely kinetic, considerations. We devise a LGM that is not prone to crystallization and displays properties of a fragile glass-forming liquid. Particle motion in this model tends to be locally anisotropic on intermediate time scales even though the rules governing the model are isotropic. The model demonstrates violations of the Stokes-Einstein relation and the growth of various length scales associated with dynamical heterogeneity. We discuss future avenues of research comparing the predictions of lattice glass models and kinetically constrained models to atomistic systems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access