Source author record

Richard Chow

Richard Chow appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Cryptography and Security Information Retrieval Networking and Internet Architecture

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2020arXiv

Democratizing the Edge: A Pervasive Edge Computing Framework

The needs of emerging applications, such as augmented and virtual reality, federated machine learning, and autonomous driving, have motivated edge computing--the push of computation capabilities to the edge. Various edge computing architectures have emerged, including multi-access edge computing and edge-cloud, all with the premise of reducing communication latency and augmenting privacy. However, these architectures rely on static and pre-deployed infrastructure, falling short in harnessing the abundant resources at the network's edge. In this paper, we discuss the design of Pervasive Edge Computing (PEC)--a democratized edge computing framework, which enables end-user devices (e.g., smartphones, IoT devices, and vehicles) to dynamically participate in a large-scale computing ecosystem. Our vision of the democratized edge involves the real-time composition of services using available edge resources like data, software, and compute-hardware from multiple stakeholders. We discuss how the novel Named-Data Networking architecture can facilitate service deployment, discovery, invocation, and migration. We also discuss the economic models critical to the adoption of PEC and the outstanding challenges for its full realization.

preprint2015arXiv

Albatross: a Privacy-Preserving Location Sharing System

Social networking services are increasingly accessed through mobile devices. This trend has prompted services such as Facebook and Google+ to incorporate location as a de facto feature of user interaction. At the same time, services based on location such as Foursquare and Shopkick are also growing as smartphone market penetration increases. In fact, this growth is happening despite concerns (growing at a similar pace) about security and third-party use of private location information (e.g., for advertising). Nevertheless, service providers have been unwilling to build truly private systems in which they do not have access to location information. In this paper, we describe an architecture and a trial implementation of a privacy-preserving location sharing system called Albatross. The system protects location information from the service provider and yet enables fine-grained location-sharing. One main feature of the system is to protect an individual's social network structure. The pattern of location sharing preferences towards contacts can reveal this structure without any knowledge of the locations themselves. Albatross protects locations sharing preferences through protocol unification and masking. Albatross has been implemented as a standalone solution, but the technology can also be integrated into location-based services to enhance privacy.

preprint2013arXiv

Differential Data Analysis for Recommender Systems

We present techniques to characterize which data is important to a recommender system and which is not. Important data is data that contributes most to the accuracy of the recommendation algorithm, while less important data contributes less to the accuracy or even decreases it. Characterizing the importance of data has two potential direct benefits: (1) increased privacy and (2) reduced data management costs, including storage. For privacy, we enable increased recommendation accuracy for comparable privacy levels using existing data obfuscation techniques. For storage, our results indicate that we can achieve large reductions in recommendation data and yet maintain recommendation accuracy. Our main technique is called differential data analysis. The name is inspired by other sorts of differential analysis, such as differential power analysis and differential cryptanalysis, where insight comes through analysis of slightly differing inputs. In differential data analysis we chunk the data and compare results in the presence or absence of each chunk. We present results applying differential data analysis to two datasets and three different kinds of attributes. The first attribute is called user hardship. This is a novel attribute, particularly relevant to location datasets, that indicates how burdensome a data point was to achieve. The second and third attributes are more standard: timestamp and user rating. For user rating, we confirm previous work concerning the increased importance to the recommender of data corresponding to high and low user ratings.