Source author record

Raymond van Venetië

Raymond van Venetië appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

5works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A wavelet-in-time, finite element-in-space adaptive method for parabolic evolution equations

In this work, an $r$-linearly converging adaptive solver is constructed for parabolic evolution equations in a simultaneous space-time variational formulation. Exploiting the product structure of the space-time cylinder, the family of trial spaces that we consider are given as the spans of wavelets-in-time and (locally refined) finite element spaces-in-space. Numerical results illustrate our theoretical findings.

preprint2021arXiv

Adaptive space-time BEM for the heat equation

We consider the space-time boundary element method (BEM) for the heat equation with prescribed initial and Dirichlet data. We propose a residual-type a posteriori error estimator that is a lower bound and, up to weighted $L_2$-norms of the residual, also an upper bound for the unknown BEM error. The possibly locally refined meshes are assumed to be prismatic, i.e., their elements are tensor-products $J\times K$ of elements in time $J$ and space $K$. While the results do not depend on the local aspect ratio between time and space, assuming the scaling $|J| \eqsim {\rm diam}(K)^2$ for all elements and using Galerkin BEM, the estimator is shown to be efficient and reliable without the additional $L_2$-terms. In the considered numerical experiments on two-dimensional domains in space, the estimator seems to be equivalent to the error, independently of these assumptions. In particular for adaptive anisotropic refinement, both converge with the best possible convergence rate.

preprint2020arXiv

Uniform preconditioners of linear complexity for problems of negative order

We propose a multi-level type operator that can be used in the framework of operator (or Caldéron) preconditioning to construct uniform preconditioners for negative order operators discretized by piecewise polynomials on a family of possibly locally refined partitions. The cost of applying this multi-level operator scales linearly in the number of mesh cells. Therefore, it provides a uniform preconditioner that can be applied in linear complexity when used within the preconditioning framework from our earlier work [Math. of Comp., 322(89) (2020), pp. 645-674].

preprint2019arXiv

Uniform preconditioners for problems of positive order

Using the framework of operator or Caldéron preconditioning, uniform preconditioners are constructed for elliptic operators of order $2s \in [0,2]$ discretized with continuous finite (or boundary) elements. The cost of the preconditioner is the cost of the application an elliptic opposite order operator discretized with discontinuous or continuous finite elements on the same mesh, plus minor cost of linear complexity. Herewith the construction of a so-called dual mesh is avoided.

preprint2018arXiv

Uniform preconditioners for problems of negative order

Uniform preconditioners for operators of negative order discretized by (dis)continuous piecewise polynomials of any order are constructed from a boundedly invertible operator of opposite order discretized by continuous piecewise linears. Besides the cost of the application of the latter discretized operator, the other cost of the preconditioner scales linearly with the number of mesh cells. Compared to earlier proposals, the preconditioner has the following advantages: It does not require the inverse of a non-diagonal matrix; it applies without any mildly grading assumption on the mesh; and it does not require a barycentric refinement of the mesh underlying the trial space.