BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Rajendra Singh Bhati

Rajendra Singh Bhati contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
quant-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Revealing quantum contextuality using a single measurement device

In this work we analyse the notion of measurement non-contextuality (MNC) and identify contextual scenarios which involve sequential measurements of only a single measurement device. We show that any non-contextual ontological model fails to explain the statistics of outcomes of a single carefully constructed positive operator valued measure (POVM) executed sequentially on a quantum system. The context of measurement arises from the different configurations in which the device can be used. We develop an inequality from the non-contextual (NC) ontic model, and construct a quantum situation involving measurements from the KCBS inequality. We show that the resultant statistics arising from this device violate our NC inequality. This device can be generalised by incorporating measurements from arbitrary $n$-cycle contextuality inequalities of which $n = 5$ corresponds to the KCBS inequality. We show that the NC and quantum bounds for various scenarios can be derived more easily using only the functional relationships between the outcomes for larger values $n$. This makes it one of the simpler contextual inequalities to analyse.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

No contextual advantage in non-paradoxical scenarios of two state vector formalism

The two state vector formalism (TSVF) was proposed by Aharonov, Bergmann, and Lebowitz (ABL) to provide a way for the counterfactual assignment of the probabilities of outcomes of contemplated but unperformed measurements on quantum systems. This formalism underlies various aspects of foundations of quantum theory and has been used significantly in the development of weak values and several proofs of quantum contextuality. We consider the application of TSVF, with pre- and post-selection (PPS) and the corresponding ABL rule, as a means to unearth quantum contextuality. We use the principle of exclusivity to classify the resultant pre- and post-selection scenarios as either paradoxical or non-paradoxical. In light of this, we find that several previous proofs of the emergence of contextuality in PPS scenarios are only possible if the principle of exclusivity is violated and are therefore classified as paradoxical. We argue that these do not constitute a proper test of contextuality. Furthermore, we provide a numerical analysis for the KCBS scenario as applied in the paradigm of TSVF and find that non-paradoxical scenarios do not offer any contextual advantage. Our approach can be easily generalized for other contextual scenarios as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Do weak values capture the complete truth about the past of a quantum particle?

Weak values inferred from weak measurements have been proposed as a tool to investigate trajectories of pre- and post-selected quantum systems. Are the inferences drawn from the weak values about the past of a quantum particle fully true? Can the two-state vector formalism predict everything that the standard formalism of quantum mechanics can? To investigate these questions we present a "which-path" gedanken experiment in which the information revealed by a pre- and post-selected quantum system is surprisingly different from what one would expect from the weak values computed using the two-state vector formalism. In our gedanken experiment, a particle reveals its presence in locations where the weak value of the projection operator onto those locations was vanishingly small. Therefore our predictions turn out to be in contradistinction to those made based on the nonvanishing weak values as the presence indicators of the quantum particle. We propose a six port photon-based interferometer setup as a possible physical realization of our gedanken experiment.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access