Researcher profile

Raffaele Soloperto

Raffaele Soloperto contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Adaptive Economic Model Predictive Control: Performance Guarantees for Nonlinear Systems

We consider the problem of optimizing the economic performance of nonlinear constrained systems subject to uncertain time-varying parameters and bounded disturbances. In particular, we propose an adaptive economic model predictive control (MPC) framework that: (i) directly minimizes transient economic costs, (ii) addresses parametric uncertainty through online model adaptation, (iii) determines optimal setpoints online, and (iv) ensures robustness by using a tube-based approach. The proposed design ensures recursive feasibility, robust constraint satisfaction, and a transient performance bound. In case the disturbances have a finite energy and the parameter variations have a finite path length, the asymptotic average performance is (approximately) not worse than the performance obtained when operating at the best reachable steady-state. We highlight performance benefits in a numerical example involving a chemical reactor with unknown time-invariant and time-varying parameters.

preprint2022arXiv

Safe Exploration and Escape Local Minima with Model Predictive Control under Partially Unknown Constraints

In this paper, we propose a novel model predictive control (MPC) framework for output tracking that deals with partially unknown constraints. The MPC scheme optimizes over a learning and a backup trajectory. The learning trajectory aims to explore unknown and potentially unsafe areas, if and only if this might lead to a potential performance improvement. On the contrary, the backup trajectory lies in the known space, and is intended to ensure safety and convergence. The cost function for the learning trajectory is divided into a tracking and an offset cost, while the cost function for the backup trajectory is only marginally considered and only penalizes the offset cost. We show that the proposed MPC scheme is not only able to safely explore the unknown constraints, but also escape from local minima that may arise from the presence of obstacles. Moreover, we provide formal guarantees for convergence and recursive feasibility of the MPC scheme, as well as closed-loop constraint satisfaction. Finally, the proposed MPC scheme is demonstrated in simulations using an example of autonomous vehicle driving in a partially unknown environment where unknown obstacles are present.

preprint2020arXiv

A computationally efficient robust model predictive control framework for uncertain nonlinear systems -- extended version

In this paper, we present a nonlinear robust model predictive control (MPC) framework for general (state and input dependent) disturbances. This approach uses an online constructed tube in order to tighten the nominal (state and input) constraints. To facilitate an efficient online implementation, the shape of the tube is based on an offline computed incremental Lyapunov function with a corresponding (nonlinear) incrementally stabilizing feedback. Crucially, the online optimization only implicitly includes these nonlinear functions in terms of scalar bounds, which enables an efficient implementation. Furthermore, to account for an efficient evaluation of the worst case disturbance, a simple function is constructed offline that upper bounds the possible disturbance realizations in a neighbourhood of a given point of the open-loop trajectory. The resulting MPC scheme ensures robust constraint satisfaction and practical asymptotic stability with a moderate increase in the online computational demand compared to a nominal MPC. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework in comparison to state of the art robust MPC approaches with a nonlinear benchmark example. This paper is an extended version of [1], and contains further details and additional considers: continuous-time systems (App. A), more general nonlinear constraints (App. B) and special cases (Sec. IV).

preprint2020arXiv

Linear robust adaptive model predictive control: Computational complexity and conservatism -- extended version

In this paper, we present a robust adaptive model predictive control (MPC) scheme for linear systems subject to parametric uncertainty and additive disturbances. The proposed approach provides a computationally efficient formulation with theoretical guarantees (constraint satisfaction and stability), while allowing for reduced conservatism and improved performance due to online parameter adaptation. A moving window parameter set identification is used to compute a fixed complexity parameter set based on past data. Robust constraint satisfaction is achieved by using a computationally efficient tube based robust MPC method. The predicted cost function is based on a least mean squares point estimate, which ensures finite-gain $\mathcal{L}_2$ stability of the closed loop. The overall algorithm has a fixed (user specified) computational complexity. We illustrate the applicability of the approach and the trade-off between conservatism and computational complexity using a numerical example. This paper is an extended version of~[1], and contains additional details regarding the theoretical proof of Theorem~1, the numerical example, and the offline computations in Appendix~A--B.