BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Radha Jagadeesan

Radha Jagadeesan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Logic in Computer ScienceProgramming LanguagesCryptography and Security

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Games for Dependent Types

We present a model of dependent type theory (DTT) with Pi-, 1-, Sigma- and intensional Id-types, which is based on a slight variation of the category of AJM-games and history-free winning strategies. The model satisfies Streicher's criteria of intensionality and refutes function extensionality. The principle of uniqueness of identity proofs is satisfied. We show it contains a submodel as a full subcategory which gives a faithful model of DTT with Pi-, 1-, Sigma- and intensional Id-types and, additionally, finite inductive type families. This smaller model is fully (and faithfully) complete with respect to the syntax at the type hierarchy built without Id-types, as well as at the class of types where we allow for one strictly positive occurrence of an Id-type. Definability for the full type hierarchy with Id-types remains to be investigated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Between Linearizability and Quiescent Consistency: Quantitative Quiescent Consistency

Linearizability is the de facto correctness criterion for concurrent data structures. Unfortunately, linearizability imposes a performance penalty which scales linearly in the number of contending threads. Quiescent consistency is an alternative criterion which guarantees that a concurrent data structure behaves correctly when accessed sequentially. Yet quiescent consistency says very little about executions that have any contention. We define quantitative quiescent consistency (QQC), a relaxation of linearizability where the degree of relaxation is proportional to the degree of contention. When quiescent, no relaxation is allowed, and therefore QQC refines quiescent consistency, unlike other proposed relaxations of linearizability. We show that high performance counters and stacks designed to satisfy quiescent consistency continue to satisfy QQC. The precise assumptions under which QQC holds provides fresh insight on these structures. To demonstrate the robustness of QQC, we provide three natural characterizations and prove compositionality.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Full Abstraction for PCF

An intensional model for the programming language PCF is described, in which the types of PCF are interpreted by games, and the terms by certain "history-free" strategies. This model is shown to capture definability in PCF. More precisely, every compact strategy in the model is definable in a certain simple extension of PCF. We then introduce an intrinsic preorder on strategies, and show that it satisfies some striking properties, such that the intrinsic preorder on function types coincides with the pointwise preorder. We then obtain an order-extensional fully abstract model of PCF by quotienting the intensional model by the intrinsic preorder. This is the first syntax-independent description of the fully abstract model for PCF. (Hyland and Ong have obtained very similar results by a somewhat different route, independently and at the same time). We then consider the effective version of our model, and prove a Universality Theorem: every element of the effective extensional model is definable in PCF. Equivalently, every recursive strategy is definable up to observational equivalence.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Game Semantics for Access Control

We introduce a semantic approach to the study of logics for access control and dependency analysis, based on Game Semantics. We use a variant of AJM games with explicit justification (but without pointers). Based on this, we give a simple and intuitive model of the information flow constraints underlying access control. This is used to give strikingly simple proofs of \emph{non-interference theorems} in robust, semantic versions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A Game Semantics for Generic Polymorphism

Genericity is the idea that the same program can work at many different data types. Longo, Milstead and Soloviev proposed to capture the inability of generic programs to probe the structure of their instances by the following equational principle: if two generic programs, viewed as terms of type $\forall X. \, A[X]$, are equal at any given instance $A[T]$, then they are equal at all instances. They proved that this rule is admissible in a certain extension of System F, but finding a semantically motivated model satisfying this principle remained an open problem. In the present paper, we construct a categorical model of polymorphism, based on game semantics, which contains a large collection of generic types. This model builds on two novel constructions: -- A direct interpretation of variable types as games, with a natural notion of substitution of games. This allows moves in games A[T] to be decomposed into the generic part from A, and the part pertaining to the instance T. This leads to a simple and natural notion of generic strategy. -- A "relative polymorphic product" which expresses quantification over the type variable X in the variable type A with respect to a "universe'" which is explicitly given as an additional parameter B. We then solve a recursive equation involving this relative product to obtain a universe in a suitably "absolute" sense. Full Completeness for ML types (universal closures of quantifier-free types) is proved for this model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Games and Full Completeness for Multiplicative Linear Logic

We present a game semantics for Linear Logic, in which formulas denote games and proofs denote winning strategies. We show that our semantics yields a categorical model of Linear Logic and prove full completeness for Multiplicative Linear Logic with the MIX rule: every winning strategy is the denotation of a unique cut-free proof net. A key role is played by the notion of {\em history-free} strategy; strong connections are made between history-free strategies and the Geometry of Interaction. Our semantics incorporates a natural notion of polarity, leading to a refined treatment of the additives. We make comparisons with related work by Joyal, Blass et al.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

TCC, with History

Modern computer systems are awash in a sea of asynchronous events. There is an increasing need for a declarative language that can permit business users to specify complex event-processing rules. Such rules should be able to correlate different event streams, detect absence of events (negative information), permit aggregations over sliding windows, specify dependent sliding windows etc. For instance it should be possible to precisely state a rule such as "Every seventh trading session that DowJones has risen consecutively, and IBM's stock is off 3% over its average in this period, evaluate IBM position", "Declare the sensor as faulty if no reading has been received for 500 ms", etc. Further, the language should be implementable efficiently in an event-driven fashion. We propose the Timed (Default) Concurrent Constraint, TCC, programming framework as a foundation for such complex event processing. While very rich, the TCC framework "forgets" information from one instant to the next. We make two extensions. First, we extend the TCC model to carry the store from previous time instants as "past" information in the current time instant. This permits rules to to be written with rich queries over the past. Second, we show that many of the powerful properties of the agent language can be folded into the query language by permitting agents and queries to be defined mutually recursively, building on the testing interpretation of intuitionistic logic described in RCC \cite{radha-fsttcs05}. We show that this permits queries to move "back and forth" in the past, e.g.{} "Order a review if the last time that IBM stock price dropped by 10% in a day, there was more than 20% increase in trading volume for Oracle the following day." We provide a formal semantics for TCC + Histories and establish some basic properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

Lambda-RBAC: Programming with Role-Based Access Control

We study mechanisms that permit program components to express role constraints on clients, focusing on programmatic security mechanisms, which permit access controls to be expressed, in situ, as part of the code realizing basic functionality. In this setting, two questions immediately arise: (1) The user of a component faces the issue of safety: is a particular role sufficient to use the component? (2) The component designer faces the dual issue of protection: is a particular role demanded in all execution paths of the component? We provide a formal calculus and static analysis to answer both questions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access