Researcher profile

R. Kailasham

R. Kailasham contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

How important are fluctuations in the treatment of internal friction in polymers?

The Rouse model with internal friction (RIF), a widely used theoretical framework to interpret the effects of internal friction on conformational transitions in biomolecules, is shown to be an approximate treatment that is based on preaveraging internal friction. By comparison with Brownian dynamics simulations of an exact coarse-grained model that incorporates fluctuations in internal friction, the accuracy of the preaveraged model predictions is examined both at and away from equilibrium. While the two models predict intrachain autocorrelations that approach each other for long enough chain segments, they differ in their predictions for shorter segments. Furthermore, the two models differ qualitatively in their predictions for the chain extension and viscosity in shear flow, which is taken to represent a prototypical out-of-equilibrium condition.

preprint2020arXiv

Wet and dry internal friction can be measured with the Jarzynski equality

The existence of two types of internal friction wet and dry is revisited, and a simple protocol is proposed for distinguishing between the two types and extracting the appropriate internal friction coefficient. The scheme requires repeatedly stretching a polymer molecule, and measuring the average work dissipated in the process by applying the Jarzynski equality. The internal friction coefficient is then estimated from the average dissipated work in the extrapolated limit of zero solvent viscosity. The validity of the protocol is established through analytical calculations on a one-dimensional free-draining Hookean spring-dashpot model for a polymer, and Brownian dynamics simulations of: (a) a single-mode nonlinear spring-dashpot model for a polymer, and (b) a finitely extensible bead-spring chain with cohesive intra-chain interactions, both of which incorporate fluctuating hydrodynamic interactions. Well-established single-molecule manipulation techniques, such as optical tweezer-based pulling, can be used to implement the suggested protocol experimentally.

preprint2018arXiv

Rheological consequences of wet and dry friction in a dumbbell model with hydrodynamic interactions and internal viscosity

The effect of fluctuating internal viscosity and hydrodynamic interactions on a range of rheological properties of dilute polymer solutions is examined using a finitely extensible dumbbell model for a polymer. Brownian dynamics simulations are used to compute both transient and steady state viscometric functions in shear flow. The results enable a careful differentiation of the influence, on rheological properties, of solvent-mediated friction from that of a dissipative mechanism that is independent of solvent viscosity. In particular, hydrodynamic interactions have a significant influence on the magnitude of the stress jump at the inception of shear flow, and on the transient viscometric functions, but a negligible effect on the steady state viscometric functions at high shear rates. Zero-shear rate viscometric functions of free-draining dumbbells remain essentially independent of the internal viscosity parameter, as predicted by the Gaussian approximation, but the inclusion of hydrodynamic interactions induces a dependence on both the hydrodynamic interaction and the internal viscosity parameter. Large values of the internal viscosity parameter lead to linear viscoelastic predictions that mimic the behavior of rigid dumbbell solutions. On the other hand, steady-shear viscometric functions at high shear rates differ in general from those for rigid dumbbells, depending crucially on the finite extensibility of the dumbbell spring.