Source author record

Qin Xiao

Qin Xiao appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Evaluation of Scale-Invariance In Physiological Signals By Means Of Balanced Estimation Of Diffusion Entropy

By means of the concept of balanced estimation of diffusion entropy we evaluate reliable scale-invariance embedded in different sleep stages and stride records. Segments corresponding to Wake, light sleep, REM, and deep sleep stages are extracted from long-term EEG signals. For each stage the scaling value distributes in a considerable wide range, which tell us that the scaling behavior is subject- and sleep cycle- dependent. The average of the scaling exponent values for wake segments is almost the same with that for REM segments ($\sim 0.8$). Wake and REM stages have significant high value of average scaling exponent, compared with that for light sleep stages ($\sim 0.7$). For the stride series, the original diffusion entropy (DE) and balanced estimation of diffusion entropy (BEDE) give almost the same results for de-trended series. Evolutions of local scaling invariance show that the physiological states change abruptly, though in the experiments great efforts have been done to keep conditions unchanged. Global behaviors of a single physiological signal may lose rich information on physiological states. Methodologically, BEDE can evaluate with considerable precision scale-invariance in very short time series ($\sim 10^2$), while the original DE method sometimes may underestimate scale-invariance exponents or even fail in detecting scale-invariant behavior. The BEDE method is sensitive to trends in time series. Existence of trend may leads to a unreasonable high value of scaling exponent, and consequent mistake conclusions.