Researcher profile

Prudence W. H. Wong

Prudence W. H. Wong contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Online Regenerator Placement

Connections between nodes in optical networks are realized by lightpaths. Due to the decay of the signal, a regenerator has to be placed on every lightpath after at most $d$ hops, for some given positive integer $d$. A regenerator can serve only one lightpath. The placement of regenerators has become an active area of research during recent years, and various optimization problems have been studied. The first such problem is the Regeneration Location Problem ($\prb$), where the goal is to place the regenerators so as to minimize the total number of nodes containing them. We consider two extreme cases of online $\prb$ regarding the value of $d$ and the number $k$ of regenerators that can be used in any single node. (1) $d$ is arbitrary and $k$ unbounded. In this case a feasible solution always exists. We show an $O(\log \abs{X} \cdot \log d)$-competitive randomized algorithm for any network topology, where $X$ is the set of paths of length $d$. The algorithm can be made deterministic in some cases. We show a deterministic lower bound of $Ω\lb$, where $E$ is the edge set. (2) $d=2$ and $k=1$. In this case there is not necessarily a solution for a given input. We distinguish between feasible inputs (for which there is a solution) and infeasible ones. In the latter case, the objective is to satisfy the maximum number of lightpaths. For a path topology we show a lower bound of $\sqrt{l}/2$ for the competitive ratio (where $l$ is the number of internal nodes of the longest lightpath) on infeasible inputs, and a tight bound of 3 for the competitive ratio on feasible inputs.

preprint2010arXiv

Hardness and Approximation of The Asynchronous Border Minimization Problem

We study a combinatorial problem arising from microarrays synthesis. The synthesis is done by a light-directed chemical process. The objective is to minimize unintended illumination that may contaminate the quality of experiments. Unintended illumination is measured by a notion called border length and the problem is called Border Minimization Problem (BMP). The objective of the BMP is to place a set of probe sequences in the array and find an embedding (deposition of nucleotides/residues to the array cells) such that the sum of border length is minimized. A variant of the problem, called P-BMP, is that the placement is given and the concern is simply to find the embedding. Approximation algorithms have been previously proposed for the problem but it is unknown whether the problem is NP-hard or not. In this paper, we give a thorough study of different variations of BMP by giving NP-hardness proofs and improved approximation algorithms. We show that P-BMP, 1D-BMP, and BMP are all NP-hard. Contrast with the previous result that 1D-P-BMP is polynomial time solvable, the interesting implications include (i) the array dimension (1D or 2D) differentiates the complexity of P-BMP; (ii) for 1D array, whether placement is given differentiates the complexity of BMP; (iii) BMP is NP-hard regardless of the dimension of the array. Another contribution of the paper is improving the approximation for BMP from $O(n^{1/2} \log^2 n)$ to $O(n^{1/4} \log^2 n)$, where $n$ is the total number of sequences.