Source author record

Prerona Chatterjee

Prerona Chatterjee appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

New Lower Bounds against Homogeneous Non-Commutative Circuits

We give several new lower bounds on size of homogeneous non-commutative circuits. We present an explicit homogeneous bivariate polynomial of degree $d$ which requires homogeneous non-commutative circuit of size $Ω(d/\log d)$. For an $n$-variate polynomial with $n>1$, the result can be improved to $Ω(nd)$, if $d\leq n$, or $Ω(nd \frac{\log n}{\log d})$, if $d\geq n$. Under the same assumptions, we also give a quadratic lower bound for the ordered version of the central symmetric polynomial.

preprint2021arXiv

Separating ABPs and Some Structured Formulas in the Non-Commutative Setting

The motivating question for this work is a long standing open problem, posed by Nisan (1991), regarding the relative powers of algebraic branching programs (ABPs) and formulas in the non-commutative setting. Even though the general question continues to remain open, we make some progress towards its resolution. To that effect, we generalise the notion of ordered polynomials in the non-commutative setting (defined by \Hrubes, Wigderson and Yehudayoff (2011)) to define abecedarian polynomials and models that naturally compute them. Our main contribution is a possible new approach towards separating formulas and ABPs in the non-commutative setting, via lower bounds against abecedarian formulas. In particular, we show the following. There is an explicit n-variate degree d abecedarian polynomial $f_{n,d}(x)$ such that 1. $f_{n, d}(x)$ can be computed by an abecedarian ABP of size O(nd); 2. any abecedarian formula computing $f_{n, \log n}(x)$ must have size that is super-polynomial in n. We also show that a super-polynomial lower bound against abecedarian formulas for $f_{\log n, n}(x)$ would separate the powers of formulas and ABPs in the non-commutative setting.

preprint2020arXiv

A Quadratic Lower Bound for Algebraic Branching Programs and Formulas

We show that any Algebraic Branching Program (ABP) computing the polynomial $\sum_{i = 1}^n x_i^n$ has at least $Ω(n^2)$ vertices. This improves upon the lower bound of $Ω(n\log n)$, which follows from the classical result of Baur and Strassen [Str73, BS83], and extends the results in [K19], which showed a quadratic lower bound for \emph{homogeneous} ABPs computing the same polynomial. Our proof relies on a notion of depth reduction which is reminiscent of similar statements in the context of matrix rigidity, and shows that any small enough ABP computing the polynomial $\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^n$ can be depth reduced to essentially a homogeneous ABP of the same size which computes the polynomial $\sum_{i = 1}^n x_i^n + ε(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$, for a structured "error polynomial" $ε(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$. To complete the proof, we then observe that the lower bound in [K19] is robust enough and continues to hold for all polynomials $\sum_{i = 1}^n x_i^n + ε(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$, where $ε(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ has the appropriate structure. We also use our ideas to show an $Ω(n^2)$ lower bound of the size of algebraic formulas computing the elementary symmetric polynomial of degree $0.1n$ on $n$ variables. This is a slight improvement upon the prior best known formula lower bound (proved for a different polynomial) of $Ω(n^2/\log n)$ [Nec66, K85, SY10]. Interestingly, this lower bound is asymptotically better than $n^2/\log n$, the strongest lower bound that can be proved using previous methods. This lower bound also matches the upper bound, due to Ben-Or, who showed that elementary symmetric polynomials can be computed by algebraic formula (in fact depth-$3$ formula) of size $O(n^2)$. Prior to this work, Ben-Or's construction was known to be optimal only for algebraic formulas of depth-$3$ [SW01].