BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Premkumar Karumbu

Premkumar Karumbu contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Networking and Internet ArchitectureInformation Theorymath.ITApplications

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Proportional Fair Coding for Wireless Mesh Networks

We consider multi--hop wireless networks carrying unicast flows for multiple users. Each flow has a specified delay deadline, and the lossy wireless links are modelled as binary symmetric channels (BSCs). Since transmission time, also called airtime, on the links is shared amongst flows, increasing the airtime for one flow comes at the cost of reducing the airtime available to other flows sharing the same link. We derive the joint allocation of flow airtimes and coding rates that achieves the proportionally fair throughput allocation. This utility optimisation problem is non--convex, and one of the technical contributions of this paper is to show that the proportional fair utility optimisation can nevertheless be decomposed into a sequence of convex optimisation problems. The solution to this sequence of convex problems is the unique solution to the original non--convex optimisation. Surprisingly, this solution can be written in an explicit form that yields considerable insight into the nature of the proportional fair joint airtime/coding rate allocation. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the utility fair joint allocation of airtime/coding rate has been analysed, and also, one of the first times that utility fairness with delay deadlines has been considered.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Distributed Detection/Isolation Procedures for Quickest Event Detection in Large Extent Wireless Sensor Networks

We study a problem of distributed detection of a stationary point event in a large extent wireless sensor network ($\wsn$), where the event influences the observations of the sensors only in the vicinity of where it occurs. An event occurs at an unknown time and at a random location in the coverage region (or region of interest ($\ROI$)) of the $\wsn$. We consider a general sensing model in which the effect of the event at a sensor node depends on the distance between the event and the sensor node; in particular, in the Boolean sensing model, all sensors in a disk of a given radius around the event are equally affected. Following the prior work reported in \cite{nikiforov95change_isolation}, \cite{nikiforov03lower-bound-for-det-isolation}, \cite{tartakovsky08multi-decision}, {\em the problem is formulated as that of detecting the event and locating it to a subregion of the $\ROI$ as early as possible under the constraints that the average run length to false alarm ($\tfa$) is bounded below by $γ$, and the probability of false isolation ($\pfi$) is bounded above by $α$}, where $γ$ and $α$ are target performance requirements. In this setting, we propose distributed procedures for event detection and isolation (namely $\mx$, $\all$, and $\hall$), based on the local fusion of $\CUSUM$s at the sensors. For these procedures, we obtain bounds on the maximum mean detection/isolation delay ($\add$), and on $\tfa$ and $\pfi$, and thus provide an upper bound on $\add$ as $\min\{γ,1/α\} \to \infty$. For the Boolean sensing model, we show that an asymptotic upper bound on the maximum mean detection/isolation delay of our distributed procedure scales with $γ$ and $α$ in the same way as the asymptotically optimal centralised procedure \cite{nikiforov03lower-bound-for-det-isolation}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Optimum Sleep-Wake Scheduling of Sensors for Quickest Event Detection in Small Extent Wireless Sensor Networks

We consider the problem of quickest event detection with sleep-wake scheduling in small extent wireless sensor networks in which, at each time slot, each sensor node in the awake state observes a sample and communicates the information to the fusion centre. The sensor nodes in the sleep state do not sample or communicate any information to the fusion centre (FC), thereby conserving energy. At each time slot, the FC, after having received the samples from the sensor nodes in the wake state, makes a decision to stop (and thus declare that the event has occurred) or to continue observing. If it decides to continue, the FC also makes the decision of choosing the number of sensor nodes to be in the wake state in the next time slot. We consider three alternative approaches to the problem of choosing the number of sensor nodes to be in the wake state in time slot k+1, based on the information available at time slot k, namely, 1. optimal control of M_{k+1}, the number of sensor nodes to be in the awake state in time slot k+1, 2. optimal control of q_{k+1}, the probability of a sensor node to be in the awake state in time slot k+1, and 3. optimal probability q that a sensor node is in the awake state in any time slot. In each case, we formulate the problem as a sequential decision process. We show that a sufficient statistic for the decision at time k is the a posteriori probability of change Pi_k. Also, we show that the optimal stopping rule is a threshold rule on Pi_k. The optimal policy for M_{k+1} can keep very few sensors wake during the prechange phase and then quickly increase the number of sensors in the wake state when a change is "suspected". Among the three sleep-wake algorithms described, we observe that the total cost is minimum for the optimum control of M_{k+1} and is maximum for the optimum control on q.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access