Source author record

Prateek Vashishtha and

Prateek Vashishtha and appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
4topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Signal Recovery in Uncorrelated and Correlated Dictionaries Using Orthogonal Least Squares

Though the method of least squares has been used for a long time in solving signal processing problems, in the recent field of sparse recovery from compressed measurements, this method has not been given much attention. In this paper we show that a method in the least squares family, known in the literature as Orthogonal Least Squares (OLS), adapted for compressed recovery problems, has competitive recovery performance and computation complexity, that makes it a suitable alternative to popular greedy methods like Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP). We show that with a slight modification, OLS can exactly recover a $K$-sparse signal, embedded in an $N$ dimensional space ($K<<N$) in $M=\mathcal{O}(K\log (N/K))$ no of measurements with Gaussian dictionaries. We also show that OLS can be easily implemented in such a way that it requires $\mathcal{O}(KMN)$ no of floating point operations similar to that of OMP. In this paper performance of OLS is also studied with sensing matrices with correlated dictionary, in which algorithms like OMP does not exhibit good recovery performance. We study the recovery performance of OLS in a specific dictionary called \emph{generalized hybrid dictionary}, which is shown to be a correlated dictionary, and show numerically that OLS has is far superior to OMP in these kind of dictionaries in terms of recovery performance. Finally we provide analytical justifications that corroborate the findings in the numerical illustrations.