Researcher profile

Pradeep Moise

Pradeep Moise contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - Baseline
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Connecting transonic buffet with incompressible low-frequency oscillations on aerofoils

Self-sustained low-frequency flow unsteadiness over rigid aerofoils in the transonic regime is referred to as transonic buffet. Although the exact physical mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are unclear, it is generally assumed to be unique to the transonic regime. This assumption is shown to be incorrect here by performing large-eddy simulations of flow over a NACA0012 profile for a wide range of flow conditions. At zero incidence and sufficiently high freestream Mach numbers, M, transonic buffet occurs with shock waves present in the flow. However, self-sustained oscillations that occur at similar frequencies are observed at lower M for which shock waves are absent and the entire flow field remains subsonic at all times. At higher incidences, the oscillations are sustained at progressively lower M. Oscillations were observed for M as low as 0.3, where compressibility effects are small. A spectral proper orthogonal decomposition shows that the spatial structure of these oscillations (i.e., mode shapes) are essentially the same for all cases. These results indicate that buffet on aerofoils does not necessarily require the presence of shock waves. Furthermore, the trend seen with increasing incidence angles suggests that transonic buffet on aerofoils and low-frequency oscillations reported in the incompressible regime (Zaman et al., 1989, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 202, pp. 403--442) have similar origins. Thus, models which rely specifically on shock waves to explain transonic buffet are incorrect. These insights could be useful in understanding the origins of ``transonic" buffet and reformulating mitigation strategies by shifting the focus away from shock waves.

preprint2022arXiv

Transonic buffet characteristics under conditions of free and forced transition

Transonic buffet is commonly associated with self-sustained flow unsteadiness involving shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction over aerofoils and wings. The phenomenon has been classified as either laminar or turbulent based on the state of the boundary layer immediately upstream of the shock foot and distinct mechanisms for the two types have been suggested. The turbulent case is known to be associated with a global linear instability. Herein, large-eddy simulations are used for the first time to make direct comparisons of the two types by examining free- and forced-transition conditions. Corresponding simulations based on the Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes equations for the forced-transition case are also performed for comparison with the scale-resolving approach and for linking the findings with existing literature. Coherent flow features are scrutinised using both data-based spectral proper orthogonal decomposition of the time-marched results and operator-based global linear stability and resolvent analyses within the Reynolds-averaged Navier--Stokes framework. It is demonstrated that the essential dynamic features remain the same for the two buffet types (and for the two levels of the aerodynamic modelling hierarchy), suggesting that both types arise due to the same fundamental mechanism.

preprint2021arXiv

Large Eddy Simulations and modal reconstruction of laminar transonic buffet

Transonic buffet refers to the self-sustained periodic motion of shock waves observed in transonic flows over wings and limits the flight envelope of aircraft. Based on the boundary layer characteristics at the shock foot, buffet has been classified as laminar or turbulent and the mechanisms underlying the two have been proposed to be different (Dandois et al., 2018, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 18, pp. 156-178). The effect of various flow parameters (freestream Mach and Reynolds numbers and sweep and incidence angles) on laminar transonic buffet on an infinite wing (Dassault Aviation's supercritical V2C aerofoil) is reported here by performing Large-Eddy Simulations (LES) for a wide range of parameters. A spectral proper orthogonal decomposition identified the presence of a low-frequency mode associated with buffet and high-frequency wake modes related to vortex shedding. A flow reconstruction based only on the former shows periodic boundary-layer separation and reattachment accompanying shock wave motion. A modal reconstruction based only on the wake mode suggests that the separation bubble breathing phenomenon reported by Dandois et al. is due to this mode. Together, these results indicate that the physical mechanisms governing laminar and turbulent buffet are the same. Buffet was also simulated at zero incidence. Shock waves appear on both aerofoil surfaces and oscillate out of phase with each other indicating the occurrence of a Type I buffet (Giannelis et al., 2018, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 18, pp. 89-101) on a supercritical aerofoil. These results suggest that the mechanisms underlying different buffet types are the same.