Researcher profile

Pooria Dehghanian

Pooria Dehghanian contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

The Effects of Correctly Modeling Generator Step-Up Transformer Status in Geomagnetic Disturbance Studies

In order to correctly model the impacts of geomagnetically induced current (GIC) flows, the generator step-up (GSU) transformer status must be properly modeled. In power flow studies, generators are typically removed from service without disconnecting their GSU transformers since the GSU transformer status has little to no impact on the power flow result. In reality, removing a generator from service involves also removing its GSU transformer from service. This difference presents a discrepancy between simulated behavior and system observations during geomagnetic disturbance (GMD) events. This paper presents GMD case studies on 2000-bus and 24,000-bus systems in which reactive power losses and geomagnetically induced currents are compared across scenarios in which the GSU transformers for the disconnected generators are either in-service or out-of-service. The results demonstrate a 3.2 to 15.5 percent error in reactive power losses when the GSU status is modeled incorrectly. Discrepancies of up to 95 A per phase for branch GIC flows and 450 A for transformer neutral GIC flows are also observed and visualized.

preprint2020arXiv

Application of Transformer Impedance Correction Tables in Power Flow Studies

Phase Shifting Transformers (PST) are used to control or block certain flows of real power through phase angle regulation across the device. Its functionality is crucial to special situations such as eliminating loop flow through an area and balancing real power flow between parallel paths. Impedance correction tables are used to model that the impedance of phase shifting transformers often vary as a function of their phase angle shift. The focus of this paper is to consider the modeling errors if the impact of this changing impedance is ignored. The simulations are tested through different scenarios using a 37-bus test case and a 10,000-bus synthetic power grid. The results verify the important role of impedance correction factor to get more accurate and optimal power solutions.