Researcher profile

Pieter Kruizinga

Pieter Kruizinga contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

A 240 Elements Matrix Probe with Aberration Mask for 4D Carotid Artery Computational Ultrasound Imaging

Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound provides enhanced visualization of the carotid artery (CA) anatomy and volumetric flow, offering improved accuracy for cardiovascular diagnosis and monitoring. However, fully populated matrix transducers with large apertures are complex and costly to implement. Computational ultrasound imaging (cUSi) offers a promising alternative by enabling simplified hardware design through model-based reconstruction and spatial field encoding. In this work, we present a 3D cUSi system tailored for CA imaging, consisting of a 240-element matrix probe with a 40 x 24 mm$^2$ large aperture and a spatial encoding mask. We describe the system's design, characterization, and image reconstruction. Phantom experiments show that computational reconstruction using matched filtering (MF) significantly improves volumetric image quality over delay-and-sum (DAS), with spatial encoding enhancing lateral resolution at the cost of reduced contrast ratio. LSQR-based reconstruction was demonstrated to further improve resolution and suppress artifacts. Using both Hadamard and 16-angle plane wave transmission schemes, the system achieved high-resolution images with reasonable contrast, supporting the feasibility of 4D CA imaging applications.

preprint2022arXiv

Deconvolution of the Functional Ultrasound Response in the Mouse Visual Pathway Using Block-Term Decomposition

Functional ultrasound (fUS) indirectly measures brain activity by recording changes in cerebral blood volume and flow in response to neural activation. Conventional approaches model such functional neuroimaging data as the convolution between an impulse response, known as the hemodynamic response function (HRF), and a binarized representation of the input (i.e., source) signal based on the stimulus onsets, the so-called experimental paradigm (EP). However, the EP may not be enough to characterize the whole complexity of the underlying source signals that evoke the hemodynamic changes, such as in the case of spontaneous resting state activity. Furthermore, the HRF varies across brain areas and stimuli. To achieve an adaptable framework that can capture such dynamics and unknowns of the brain function, we propose a deconvolution method for multivariate fUS time-series that reveals both the region-specific HRFs, and the source signals that induce the hemodynamic responses in the studied regions. We start by modeling the fUS time-series as convolutive mixtures and use a tensor-based approach for deconvolution based on two assumptions: (1) HRFs are parametrizable, and (2) source signals are uncorrelated. We test our approach on fUS data acquired during a visual experiment on a mouse subject, focusing on three regions within the mouse brain's colliculo-cortical, image-forming pathway: the lateral geniculate nucleus, superior colliculus and visual cortex. The estimated HRFs in each region are in agreement with prior works, whereas the estimated source signal is observed to closely follow the EP. Yet, we note a few deviations from the EP in the estimated source signal that most likely arise due to the trial-by-trial variability of the neural response across different repetitions of the stimulus observed in the selected regions.