Source author record

Petr Jancar

Petr Jancar appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Formal Languages and Automata Theory Logic in Computer Science Computer Science and Game Theory

Catalog footprint

What is connected

9works

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2021arXiv

Simplest Non-Regular Deterministic Context-Free Language

We introduce a new notion of C-simple problems for a class C of decision problems (i.e. languages), w.r.t. a particular reduction. A problem is C-simple if it can be reduced to each problem in C. This can be viewed as a conceptual counterpart to C-hard problems to which all problems in C reduce. Our concrete example is the class of non-regular deterministic context-free languages (DCFL'), with a truth-table reduction by Mealy machines (which proves to be a preorder). The main technical result is a proof that the DCFL' language $L=\{0^n1^n; n\geq 1\}$ is DCFL'-simple, which can thus be viewed as the simplest problem in the class DCFL'. This result has already provided an application, to the computational model of neural networks 1ANN at the first level of analog neuron hierarchy. This model was proven not to recognize $L$, by using a specialized technical argument that can hardly be generalized to other languages in DCFL'. By the result that $L$ is DCFL'-simple, w.r.t. the reduction that can be implemented by 1ANN, we immediately obtain that 1ANN cannot accept any language in DCFL'. It thus seems worthwhile to explore if looking for C-simple problems in other classes C under suitable reductions could provide effective tools for expanding the lower-bound results known for single problems to the whole classes of problems.

preprint2020arXiv

Equivalence of pushdown automata via first-order grammars

A decidability proof for bisimulation equivalence of first-order grammars is given. It is an alternative proof for a result by Sénizergues (1998, 2005) that subsumes his affirmative solution of the famous decidability question for deterministic pushdown automata. The presented proof is conceptually simpler, and a particular novelty is that it is not given as two semidecision procedures but it provides an explicit algorithm that might be amenable to a complexity analysis.

preprint2016arXiv

Deciding structural liveness of Petri nets

Place/transition Petri nets are a standard model for a class of distributed systems whose reachability spaces might be infinite. One of well-studied topics is the verification of safety and liveness properties in this model; despite the extensive research effort, some basic problems remain open, which is exemplified by the open complexity status of the reachability problem. The liveness problems are known to be closely related to the reachability problem, and many structural properties of nets that are related to liveness have been studied. Somewhat surprisingly, the decidability status of the problem if a net is structurally live, i.e. if there is an initial marking for which it is live, has remained open, as also a recent paper (Best and Esparza, 2016) emphasizes. Here we show that the structural liveness problem for Petri nets is decidable. A crucial ingredient of the proof is the result by Leroux (LiCS 2013) showing that we can compute a finite (Presburger) description of the reachability set for a marked Petri net if this set is semilinear.

preprint2014arXiv

Bisimulation Equivalence of First-Order Grammars

A decidability proof for bisimulation equivalence of first-order grammars (finite sets of labelled rules for rewriting roots of first-order terms) is presented. The equivalence generalizes the DPDA (deterministic pushdown automata) equivalence, and the result corresponds to the result achieved by Senizergues (1998, 2005) in the framework of equational graphs, or of PDA with restricted epsilon-steps. The framework of classical first-order terms seems particularly useful for providing a proof that should be understandable for a wider audience. We also discuss an extension to branching bisimilarity, announced by Fu and Yin (2014).

preprint2013arXiv

Bisimilarity on Basic Process Algebra is in 2-ExpTime (an explicit proof)

Burkart, Caucal, Steffen (1995) showed a procedure deciding bisimulation equivalence of processes in Basic Process Algebra (BPA), i.e. of sequential processes generated by context-free grammars. They improved the previous decidability result of Christensen, Hüttel, Stirling (1992), since their procedure has obviously an elementary time complexity and the authors claim that a close analysis would reveal a double exponential upper bound. Here a self-contained direct proof of the membership in 2-ExpTime is given. This is done via a Prover-Refuter game which shows that there is an alternating Turing machine deciding the problem in exponential space. The proof uses similar ingredients (size-measures, decompositions, bases) as the previous proofs, but one new simplifying factor is an explicit addition of infinite regular strings to the state space. An auxiliary claim also shows an explicit exponential upper bound on the equivalence level of nonbisimilar normed BPA processes. The importance of clarifying the 2-ExpTime upper bound for BPA bisimilarity has recently increased due to the shift of the known lower bound from PSpace (Srba, 2002) to ExpTime (Kiefer, 2012).

preprint2013arXiv

Bisimulation equivalence of first-order grammars is Ackermann-hard

Bisimulation equivalence (or bisimilarity) of first-order grammars is decidable, as follows from the decidability result by Senizergues (1998, 2005) that has been given in an equivalent framework of equational graphs with finite out-degree, or of pushdown automata (PDA) with only deterministic and popping epsilon-transitions. Benedikt, Goeller, Kiefer, and Murawski (2013) have shown that the bisimilarity problem for PDA (even) without epsilon-transitions is nonelementary. Here we show Ackermann-hardness for bisimilarity of first-order grammars. The grammars do not use explicit epsilon-transitions, but they correspond to the above mentioned PDA with (deterministic and popping) epsilon-transitions, and this feature is substantial in the presented lower-bound proof. The proof is based on a (polynomial) reduction from the reachability problem of reset (or lossy) counter machines, for which the Ackermann-hardness has been shown by Schnoebelen (2010); in fact, this reachability problem is known to be Ackermann-complete in the hierarchy of fast-growing complexity classes defined by Schmitz (2013).

preprint2012arXiv

Bisimilarity of Probabilistic Pushdown Automata

We study the bisimilarity problem for probabilistic pushdown automata (pPDA) and subclasses thereof. Our definition of pPDA allows both probabilistic and non-deterministic branching, generalising the classical notion of pushdown automata (without epsilon-transitions). Our first contribution is a general construction that reduces checking bisimilarity of probabilistic transition systems to checking bisimilarity of non-deterministic transition systems. This construction directly yields decidability of bisimilarity for pPDA, as well as an elementary upper bound for the bisimilarity problem on the subclass of probabilistic basic process algebras, i.e., single-state pPDA. We further show that, with careful analysis, the general reduction can be used to prove an EXPTIME upper bound for bisimilarity of probabilistic visibly pushdown automata. Here we also provide a matching lower bound, establishing EXPTIME-completeness. Finally we prove that deciding bisimilarity of probabilistic one-counter automata, another subclass of pPDA, is PSPACE-complete. Here we use a more specialised argument to obtain optimal complexity bounds.

preprint2011arXiv

A Short Decidability Proof for DPDA Language Equivalence via First-Order Grammars

The main aim of the paper is to give a short self-contained proof of the decidability of language equivalence for deterministic pushdown automata, which is the famous problem solved by G. Senizergues, for which C. Stirling has derived a primitive recursive complexity upper bound. The proof here is given in the framework of first-order grammars, which seems to be particularly apt for the aim. An appendix presents a modification of Stirling's approach, yielding a complexity bound of the form tetr(2,g(n)) where tetr is the (nonelementary) operator of iterated exponentiation (tetration) and g is an elementary function of the input size.

preprint2010arXiv

Reachability Games on Extended Vector Addition Systems with States

We consider two-player turn-based games with zero-reachability and zero-safety objectives generated by extended vector addition systems with states. Although the problem of deciding the winner in such games is undecidable in general, we identify several decidable and even tractable subcases of this problem obtained by restricting the number of counters and/or the sets of target configurations.