BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Peter Winkler

Peter Winkler contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.COmath.PRComputer Science and Game TheoryDiscrete Mathematicsmath.CA

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Hunter & Mole

We consider a variation of a cops and robbers game in which the cop---here referred to as "hunter"---is not constrained by the graph but must play in the dark against a "mole." We characterize the graphs---which we will call "hunter-win"---on which the hunter can guarantee capture of the mole in bounded time. We also define an optimal hunter strategy (and consequently an upper bound on maximum game time on hunter-win graphs) and note that an optimal hunter strategy need not take advantage of the hunter's unconstrained movement! This game comes from a puzzle of unknown origin which was told to the authors by Dick Hess.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Cops vs. Gambler

We consider a variation of cop vs.\ robber on graph in which the robber is not restricted by the graph edges; instead, he picks a time-independent probability distribution on $V(G)$ and moves according to this fixed distribution. The cop moves from vertex to adjacent vertex with the goal of minimizing expected capture time. Players move simultaneously. We show that when the gambler's distribution is known, the expected capture time (with best play) on any connected $n$-vertex graph is exactly $n$. We also give bounds on the (generally greater) expected capture time when the gambler's distribution is unknown to the cop.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Hunter, Cauchy Rabbit, and Optimal Kakeya Sets

A planar set that contains a unit segment in every direction is called a Kakeya set. We relate these sets to a game of pursuit on a cycle $\Z_n$. A hunter and a rabbit move on the nodes of $\Z_n$ without seeing each other. At each step, the hunter moves to a neighbouring vertex or stays in place, while the rabbit is free to jump to any node. Adler et al (2003) provide strategies for hunter and rabbit that are optimal up to constant factors and achieve probability of capture in the first $n$ steps of order $1/\log n$. We show these strategies yield a Kakeya set consisting of $4n$ triangles with minimal area, (up to constant), namely $Θ(1/\log n)$. As far as we know, this is the first non-iterative construction of a boundary-optimal Kakeya set. Considering the continuum analog of the game yields a construction of a random Kakeya set from two independent standard Brownian motions $\{B(s): s \ge 0\}$ and $\{W(s): s \ge 0\}$. Let $τ_t:=\min\{s \ge 0: B(s)=t\}$. Then $X_t=W(τ_t)$ is a Cauchy process, and $K:=\{(a,X_t+at) : a,t \in [0,1]\}$ is a Kakeya set of zero area. The area of the $ε$-neighborhood of $K$ is as small as possible, i.e., almost surely of order $Θ(1/|\log ε|)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The Phase Transition for Dyadic Tilings

A dyadic tile of order n is any rectangle obtained from the unit square by n successive bisections by horizontal or vertical cuts. Let each dyadic tile of order n be available with probability p, independently of the others. We prove that for p sufficiently close to 1, there exists a set of pairwise disjoint available tiles whose union is the unit square, with probability tending to 1 as n->infinity, as conjectured by Joel Spencer in 1999. In particular we prove that if p=7/8, such a tiling exists with probability at least 1-(3/4)^n. The proof involves a surprisingly delicate counting argument for sets of unavailable tiles that prevent tiling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Can extra updates delay mixing?

We consider Glauber dynamics (starting from an extremal configuration) in a monotone spin system, and show that interjecting extra updates cannot increase the expected Hamming distance or the total variation distance to the stationary distribution. We deduce that for monotone Markov random fields, when block dynamics contracts a Hamming metric, single-site dynamics mixes in O(n log n) steps on an n-vertex graph. In particular, our result completes work of Kenyon, Mossel and Peres concerning Glauber dynamics for the Ising model on trees. Our approach also shows that on bipartite graphs, alternating updates systematically between odd and even vertices cannot improve the mixing time by more than a factor of log n compared to updates at uniform random locations on an n-vertex graph. Our result is especially effective in comparing block and single-site dynamics; it has already been used in works of Martinelli, Sinclair, Mossel, Sly, Ding, Lubetzky, and Peres in various combinations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access