Source author record

Peter Meckl

Peter Meckl appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Data Driven Modeling of Turbocharger Turbine using Koopman Operator

A turbocharger plays an essential part in reducing emissions and increasing the fuel efficiency of road vehicles. The pulsating flow of exhaust gases, along with high heat exchange from the turbocharger casing, makes developing control-oriented models difficult. Several researchers have used maps provided by manufacturers to solve this problem. These maps often fail to incorporate any heat transfer effects and are unsuitable for wide operating regions. Also, with the availability of more and better sensor data, there is a need for a method that can exploit this to obtain a better predictive model. Koopman approaches rely on the observation that one can lift the nonlinear dynamics of the turbine into an infinite-dimensional function space over which dynamics are linear. The objective of this paper is to develop a model to predict the transient and steady-state behavior of the turbine using the Koopman operator which can be helpful for control design and analysis. Our approach is as follows. We use experimental data from a Cummins heavy-duty diesel engine to develop a turbine model using Extended Dynamic Mode Decomposition, which approximates the action of the Koopman operator on a finite-dimensional subspace of the space of observables. The results demonstrate superior performance compared to a tuned nonlinear autoregressive network with an exogenous input model widely used in the literature. The performance of these two models is analyzed based on their ability to predict turbine transient and steady-state behavior.