Source author record

Peter Latham

Peter Latham appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

math.RT math.NT cond-mat.dis-nn Neurons and Cognition Quantitative Methods

Catalog footprint

What is connected

7works

5topics

3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

Restricting admissible representations to fixed-point subgroups

Given a $p$-adic group $G$ equipped with an action of a finite group $Γ\subset\mathrm{Aut}_F(\mathbf{G})$, and a reductive fixed-point subgroup $G^Γ$, we establish a relationship between constructions of types for these two groups due to Yu, Kim--Yu and Fintzen, and generalizes the relationship between general linear and classical groups observed by Stevens. As an application, given a parabolically induced or supercuspidal representation $π$ of $G$, we explicitly identify a number of the inertial equivalence classes occurring in the representation $π|_{G^{[Γ]}}$.

preprint2020arXiv

Typical representations via fixed point sets in Bruhat--Tits buildings

For an essentially tame supercuspidal representation $π$ of a connected reductive $p$-adic group $G$, we establish two distinct and complementary sufficient conditions for the irreducible components of its restriction to a maximal compact subgroup to occur in a representation of $G$ which is not inertially equivalent to $π$. These two results are further formulated in terms of the geometry of the Bruhat-Tits building of $G$ and its fixed points under the action of certain tori. The consequence is a set of broadly applicable tools for addressing the branching rules of $π$ and the unicity of $[G,π]_G$-types.

preprint2018arXiv

On the unicity of types for tame toral supercuspidal representations

For tame arbitrary-length toral, also called positive regular, supercuspidal representations of a simply connected and semisimple $p$-adic group $G$, constructed as per Adler-Yu, we determine which components of their restriction to a maximal compact subgroup are types. We give conditions under which there is a unique such component, and then present a class of examples for which there is not, disproving the strong version of the conjecture of unicity of types on maximal compact open subgroups. We restate the unicity conjecture, and prove it holds for the groups and representations under consideration under a mild condition on depth.

preprint2017arXiv

The unicity of types for depth-zero supercuspidal representations

We establish the unicity of types for depth-zero supercuspidal representations of an arbitrary $p$-adic group $G$, showing that each depth-zero supercuspidal representation of $G$ contains a unique conjugacy class of typical representations of maximal compact subgroups of $G$. As a corollary, we obtain an inertial Langlands correspondence for these representations, via the Langlands correspondence of DeBacker and Reeder.

preprint2016arXiv

On the unicity of types in special linear groups

Let $F$ be a non-archimedean local field. We show that any representation of a maximal compact subgroup of $\mathbf{SL}_N(F)$ which is typical for an essentially tame supercuspidal representation must be induced from a Bushnell--Kutzko maximal simple type. From this, we explicitly count and describe the conjugacy classes of such typical representations, and give an explicit description of an inertial Langlands correspondence for essentially tame irreducible $N$-dimensional projective representations of the Weil group of $F$.

preprint2015arXiv

Unicity of types for supercuspidal representations of p-adic SL(2)

We consider the question of unicity of types on maximal compact subgroups for supercuspidal representations of $\mathbf{SL}_2$ over a nonarchimedean local field of odd residual characteristic. We introduce the notion of an archetype as the $\mathbf{SL}_2$-conjugacy class of a typical representation of a maximal compact subgroup, and go on to show that any archetype in $\mathbf{SL}_2$ is restricted from one in $\mathbf{GL}_2$. From this it follows that any archetype must be induced from a Bushnell--Kutzko type. Given a supercuspidal representation $π$, we give an additional explicit description of the number of archetypes admitted by $π$ in terms of its ramification. We also describe a relationship between archetypes for $\mathbf{GL}_2$ and $\mathbf{SL}_2$ in terms of $L$-packets, and deduce an inertial Langlands correspondence for $\mathbf{SL}_2$.

preprint2008arXiv

Pairwise maximum entropy models for studying large biological systems: when they can and when they can't work

One of the most critical problems we face in the study of biological systems is building accurate statistical descriptions of them. This problem has been particularly challenging because biological systems typically contain large numbers of interacting elements, which precludes the use of standard brute force approaches. Recently, though, several groups have reported that there may be an alternate strategy. The reports show that reliable statistical models can be built without knowledge of all the interactions in a system; instead, pairwise interactions can suffice. These findings, however, are based on the analysis of small subsystems. Here we ask whether the observations will generalize to systems of realistic size, that is, whether pairwise models will provide reliable descriptions of true biological systems. Our results show that, in most cases, they will not. The reason is that there is a crossover in the predictive power of pairwise models: If the size of the subsystem is below the crossover point, then the results have no predictive power for large systems. If the size is above the crossover point, the results do have predictive power. This work thus provides a general framework for determining the extent to which pairwise models can be used to predict the behavior of whole biological systems. Applied to neural data, the size of most systems studied so far is below the crossover point.